Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sean Gerrish

dblp:35/5761 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 42% Graph learning · 36% Information extraction and text analysis · 22%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
bayesian latent variable model
0.112012
How They Vote: Issue-Adjusted Models of Legislative Behavior · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph clustering
0.112012
Scalable Inference of Overlapping Communities · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph clustering
overlapping community detection
0.112012
Scalable Inference of Overlapping Communities · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
stochastic variational inference
0.112012
Scalable Inference of Overlapping Communities · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.112012
Scalable Inference of Overlapping Communities · NIPS 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.112011
Predicting Legislative Roll Calls from Text · ICML 2011
Computational social science and digital humanities › political science
political text analysis
0.112011
Predicting Legislative Roll Calls from Text · ICML 2011
Computational social science and digital humanities › political science
roll call vote prediction
0.112011
Predicting Legislative Roll Calls from Text · ICML 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.112009
Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models · NIPS 2009
Usability and user experience research
user study
0.112009
Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Graph learning › stochastic block model
mixed-membership stochastic blockmodel
0.012012
Scalable Inference of Overlapping Communities · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Graph learning
stochastic block model
0.012012
Scalable Inference of Overlapping Communities · NIPS 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational inference · 0.3posterior inference · 0.3text classification · 0.2user study · 0.2held-out likelihood · 0.2subsampling · 0.1stochastic variational inference · 0.1text analysis · 0.1language modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Black Box Variational Inference
abstract
Variational inference has become a widely used method to approximate posteriors in complex latent variables models. However, deriving a variational inference algorithm generally requires significant model-specific analysis. These efforts can hinder and deter us from quickly developing and exploring a variety of models for a problem at hand. In this paper, we present a “black box” variational inference algorithm, one that can be quickly applied to many models with little additional derivation. Our method is based on a stochastic optimization of the variational objective where the noisy gradient is computed from Monte Carlo samples from the variational distribution. We develop a number of methods to reduce the variance of the gradient, always maintaining the criterion that we want to avoid difficult model-based derivations. We evaluate our method against the corresponding black box sampling based methods. We find that our method reaches better predictive likelihoods much faster than sampling methods. Finally, we demonstrate that Black Box Variational Inference lets us easily explore a wide space of models by quickly constructing and evaluating several models of longitudinal healthcare data.
Rajesh Ranganath, Sean Gerrish, David M. Blei
AISTATS2
2012 How They Vote: Issue-Adjusted Models of Legislative Behavior
abstract
We develop a probabilistic model of legislative data that uses the text of the bills to uncover lawmakers' positions on specific political issues. Our model can be used to explore how a lawmaker's voting patterns deviate from what is expected and how that deviation depends on what is being voted on. We derive approximate posterior inference algorithms based on variational methods. Across 12 years of legislative data, we demonstrate both improvement in heldout predictive performance and the model's utility in interpreting an inherently multi-dimensional space.
Sean Gerrish, David M. Blei
NIPS1
2012 Scalable Inference of Overlapping Communities
abstract
We develop a scalable algorithm for posterior inference of overlapping communities in large networks. Our algorithm is based on stochastic variational inference in the mixed-membership stochastic blockmodel. It naturally interleaves subsampling the network with estimating its community structure. We apply our algorithm on ten large, real-world networks with up to 60,000 nodes. It converges several orders of magnitude faster than the state-of-the-art algorithm for MMSB, finds hundreds of communities in large real-world networks, and detects the true communities in 280 benchmark networks with equal or better accuracy compared to other scalable algorithms.
Prem Gopalan, David M. Mimno, Sean Gerrish, Michael J. Freedman, David M. Blei
NIPS3
2011 Predicting Legislative Roll Calls from Text
Sean Gerrish, David M. Blei
ICML1
2010 A Language-based Approach to Measuring Scholarly Impact
Sean Gerrish, David M. Blei
ICML1
2009 Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models
abstract
Probabilistic topic models are a popular tool for the unsupervised analysis of text, providing both a predictive model of future text and a latent topic representation of the corpus. Practitioners typically assume that the latent space is semantically meaningful. It is used to check models, summarize the corpus, and guide exploration of its contents. However, whether the latent space is interpretable is in need of quantitative evaluation. In this paper, we present new quantitative methods for measuring semantic meaning in inferred topics. We back these measures with large-scale user studies, showing that they capture aspects of the model that are undetected by previous measures of model quality based on held-out likelihood. Surprisingly, topic models which perform better on held-out likelihood may infer less semantically meaningful topics.
Jonathan D. Chang, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, Sean Gerrish, Chong Wang 0002, David M. Blei
NIPS3