Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nirupma Pati

dblp:35/6393 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
dye bias correction
0.012003
Quantitative Quality Control in Microarray Experiments and the Application in Data Filtering, Normalization and False Positive Rate Prediction · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.012003
Quantitative Quality Control in Microarray Experiments and the Application in Data Filtering, Normalization and False Positive Rate Prediction · Bioinform. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical modeling · 0.0quality score · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Quantitative Quality Control in Microarray Experiments and the Application in Data Filtering, Normalization and False Positive Rate Prediction
abstract
Data preprocessing including proper normalization and adequate quality control before complex data mining is crucial for studies using the cDNA microarray technology. We have developed a simple procedure that integrates data filtering and normalization with quantitative quality control of microarray experiments. Previously we have shown that data variability in a microarray experiment can be very well captured by a quality score q(com) that is defined for every spot, and the ratio distribution depends on q(com). Utilizing this knowledge, our data-filtering scheme allows the investigator to decide on the filtering stringency according to desired data variability, and our normalization procedure corrects the q(com)-dependent dye biases in terms of both the location and the spread of the ratio distribution. In addition, we propose a statistical model for false positive rate determination based on the design and the quality of a microarray experiment. The model predicts that a lower limit of 0.5 for the replicate concordance rate is needed in order to be certain of true positives. Our work demonstrates the importance and advantages of having a quantitative quality control scheme for microarrays.
Xujing Wang, Martin J. Hessner, Nirupma Pati, Soumitra Ghosh
Bioinform.4