Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wei Wang 0373

dblp:35/7092-373 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Learning paradigms · 73% Learning theory · 17% Representation and self-supervised learning · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning
2.332025
Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithms · ICLR 2025
Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practical · ICML 2024
Binary Classification with Confidence Difference · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
partial label learning
1.932025
Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithms · ICLR 2025
Partial Label Learning with Discrimination Augmentation · KDD 2022
Semi-Supervised Partial Label Learning via Confidence-Rated Margin Maximization · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.912025
Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithms · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
complementary label learning
0.812024
Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practical · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
positive-unlabeled learning
0.812024
Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practical · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning
0.712023
Label Specific Multi-Semantics Metric Learning for Multi-Label Classification: Global Consideration Helps · IJCAI 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification
0.712023
Label Specific Multi-Semantics Metric Learning for Multi-Label Classification: Global Consideration Helps · IJCAI 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning › partial label learning
semi-supervised partial label learning
0.412020
Semi-Supervised Partial Label Learning via Confidence-Rated Margin Maximization · NeurIPS 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.312025
Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithms · ICLR 2025
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
implicit feedback
0.212023
Binary Classification with Confidence Difference · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

risk correction · 2.1estimation error bound · 1.3alternating optimization · 1.0model selection criteria · 0.9benchmark construction · 0.9unbiased risk estimator · 0.8one-versus-rest strategy · 0.8metric learning · 0.7label correlation regularization · 0.7class prototype learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithms
abstract
Partial-label learning (PLL) is a weakly supervised learning problem in which each example is associated with multiple candidate labels and only one is the true label. In recent years, many deep PLL algorithms have been developed to improve model performance. However, we find that some early developed algorithms are often underestimated and can outperform many later algorithms with complicated designs. In this paper, we delve into the empirical perspective of PLL and identify several critical but previously overlooked issues. First, model selection for PLL is non-trivial, but has never been systematically studied. Second, the experimental settings are highly inconsistent, making it difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithms. Third, there is a lack of real-world image datasets that can be compatible with modern network architectures. Based on these findings, we propose PLENCH, the first Partial-Label learning bENCHmark to systematically compare state-of-the-art deep PLL algorithms. We investigate the model selection problem for PLL for the first time, and propose novel model selection criteria with theoretical guarantees. We also create Partial-Label CIFAR-10 (PLCIFAR10), an image dataset of human-annotated partial labels collected from Amazon Mechanical Turk, to provide a testbed for evaluating the performance of PLL algorithms in more realistic scenarios. Researchers can quickly and conveniently perform a comprehensive and fair evaluation and verify the effectiveness of newly developed algorithms based on PLENCH. We hope that PLENCH will facilitate standardized, fair, and practical evaluation of PLL algorithms in the future.
Wei Wang 0373, Dong-Dong Wu, Jindong Wang 0001, Gang Niu 0001, Min-Ling Zhang, Masashi Sugiyama
ICLR1
2024 Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practical
abstract
Complementary-label learning is a weakly supervised learning problem in which each training example is associated with one or multiple complementary labels indicating the classes to which it does not belong. Existing consistent approaches have relied on the uniform distribution assumption to model the generation of complementary labels, or on an ordinary-label training set to estimate the transition matrix in non-uniform cases. However, either condition may not be satisfied in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel consistent approach that does not rely on these conditions. Inspired by the positive-unlabeled (PU) learning literature, we propose an unbiased risk estimator based on the Selected-Completely-at-Random assumption for complementary-label learning. We then introduce a risk-correction approach to address overfitting problems. Furthermore, we find that complementary-label learning can be expressed as a set of negative-unlabeled binary classification problems when using the one-versus-rest strategy. Extensive experimental results on both synthetic and real-world benchmark datasets validate the superiority of our proposed approach over state-of-the-art methods.
Wei Wang 0373, Takashi Ishida 0001, Yu-Jie Zhang, Gang Niu 0001, Masashi Sugiyama
ICML1
2023 Label Specific Multi-Semantics Metric Learning for Multi-Label Classification: Global Consideration Helps
abstract
In multi-label classification, it is critical to capitalize on complicated data structures and semantic relationships. Metric learning serves as an effective strategy to provide a better measurement of distances between examples. Existing works on metric learning for multi-label classification mainly learn one single global metric that characterizes latent semantic similarity between multi-label instances. However, such single-semantics metric exploitation approaches can not capture the intrinsic properties of multi-label data possessed of rich semantics. In this paper, the first attempt towards multi-semantics metric learning for multi-label classification is investigated. Specifically, the proposed LIMIC approach simultaneously learns one global and multiple label-specific local metrics by exploiting label-specific side information. The global metric is learned to capture the commonality across all the labels and label-specific local metrics characterize the individuality of each semantic space. The combination of global metric and label-specific local metrics is utilized to construct latent semantic space for each label, in which similar intra-class instances are pushed closer and inter-class instances are pulled apart. Furthermore, metric-based label correlation regularization is constructed to maintain similarity between correlated label spaces. Extensive experiments on benchmark multi-label data sets validate the superiority of our proposed approach in learning effective distance metrics for multi-label classification.
Junxiang Mao, Wei Wang 0373, Min-Ling Zhang
IJCAI2
2023 Binary Classification with Confidence Difference
abstract
Recently, learning with soft labels has been shown to achieve better performance than learning with hard labels in terms of model generalization, calibration, and robustness. However, collecting pointwise labeling confidence for all training examples can be challenging and time-consuming in real-world scenarios. This paper delves into a novel weakly supervised binary classification problem called confidence-difference (ConfDiff) classification. Instead of pointwise labeling confidence, we are given only unlabeled data pairs with confidence difference that specifies the difference in the probabilities of being positive. We propose a risk-consistent approach to tackle this problem and show that the estimation error bound achieves the optimal convergence rate. We also introduce a risk correction approach to mitigate overfitting problems, whose consistency and convergence rate are also proven. Extensive experiments on benchmark data sets and a real-world recommender system data set validate the effectiveness of our proposed approaches in exploiting the supervision information of the confidence difference.
Wei Wang 0373, Lei Feng 0006, Gang Niu 0001, Min-Ling Zhang, Masashi Sugiyama
NeurIPS1
2022 Partial Label Learning with Discrimination Augmentation
abstract
Partial label learning is a weakly supervised learning framework where each training example is associated with multiple candidate labels, among which only one is valid. Existing works on partial label learning mainly focus on classification model induction by disambiguating candidate label sets in the output space. Nevertheless, the feature representations of partial label training examples may be less informative of the ground-truth labels, which may result in negative influences on the disambiguation process. To circumvent this difficulty, the first attempt towards discrimination augmentation for partial label learning is investigated in this paper. The feature space is enriched with confidence-rated class prototype features to replenish discriminative characteristics of the underlying ground-truth labels for partial label training examples. Specially, an optimization formulation is proposed to jointly optimize the class prototype and estimate the labeling confidence over partial label training examples, which enforces both global consistency in the feature space and local consistency in the label space. We show that the class prototypes and the labeling confidence can be solved via alternating optimization. Extensive experiments on synthetic as well as real-world data sets validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for improving the generalization performance of state-of-the-art partial label learning algorithms.
Wei Wang 0373, Min-Ling Zhang
KDD1
2020 Semi-Supervised Partial Label Learning via Confidence-Rated Margin Maximization
abstract
Partial label learning assumes inaccurate supervision where each training example is associated with a set of candidate labels, among which only one is valid. In many real-world scenarios, however, it is costly and time-consuming to assign candidate label sets to all the training examples. To circumvent this difficulty, the problem of semi-supervised partial label learning is investigated in this paper, where unlabeled data is utilized to facilitate model induction along with partial label training examples. Specifically, label propagation is adopted to instantiate the labeling confidence of partial label examples. After that, maximum margin formulation is introduced to jointly enable the induction of predictive model and the estimation of labeling confidence over unlabeled data. The derived formulation enforces confidence-rated margin maximization and confidence manifold preservation over partial label examples and unlabeled data. We show that the predictive model and labeling confidence can be solved via alternating optimization which admits QP solutions in either alternating step. Extensive experiments on synthetic as well as real-world data sets clearly validate the effectiveness of the proposed semi-supervised partial label learning approach.
Wei Wang 0373, Min-Ling Zhang
NeurIPS1