Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elif Ozkaya

dblp:35/7983 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 74% Design research and methods · 19% Learning and educational technologies · 7%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
online communities
0.322012
Classroom Wikipedia participation effects on future intentions to contribute · CSCW 2012
Motivations to participate in online communities · CHI 2010
Collaborative and social computing › peer production
wikipedia contribution
0.112012
Classroom Wikipedia participation effects on future intentions to contribute · CSCW 2012
Design research and methods
user participation
0.112010
Motivations to participate in online communities · CHI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.3regression analysis · 0.1uses and gratifications theory · 0.1organizational commitment theory · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Classroom Wikipedia participation effects on future intentions to contribute
abstract
One of the biggest challenges faced by social media sites like Wikipedia is how to motivate users to contribute content. Research continues to demonstrate that only a small percentage of users contribute to user-generated content sites. In this study we assess the results of a Wikimedia Foundation initiative, which had graduate and undergraduate students from 22 U.S. universities contribute content to Wikipedia articles as part of their coursework. 185 students were asked about their participation in the initiative and their intention to participate on Wikipedia in the future. Results suggest that intentions to continue contributing are influenced by the initial attitude towards the class, and the degree to which students perceived they were writing for a global audience.
Paul Zube, Alcides Velasquez, Elif Ozkaya, Cliff Lampe, Jonathan Obar
CSCW3
2010 Motivations to participate in online communities
abstract
A consistent theoretical and practical challenge in the design of socio-technical systems is that of motivating users to participate in and contribute to them. This study examines the case of Everything2.com users from the theoretical perspectives of Uses and Gratifications and Organizational Commitment to compare individual versus organizational motivations in user participation. We find evidence that users may continue to participate in a site for different reasons than those that led them to the site. Feelings of belonging to a site are important for both anonymous and registered users across different types of uses. Long-term users felt more dissatisfied with the site than anonymous users. Social and cognitive factors seem to be more important than issues of usability in predicting contribution to the site.
Cliff Lampe, Rick Wash, Alcides Velasquez, Elif Ozkaya
CHI4