Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Uthus
dblp:350/4418
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 92% Machine translation · 8% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
sign language translation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Reconsidering Sentence-Level Sign Language Translation · EMNLP 2024 YouTube-ASL: A Large-Scale, Open-Domain American Sign Language-English Parallel Corpus · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › sign language processing
sign language understanding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Reconsidering Sentence-Level Sign Language Translation · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › parallel corpora
parallel corpus construction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | YouTube-ASL: A Large-Scale, Open-Domain American Sign Language-English Parallel Corpus · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
human baseline evaluation · 0.8zero-shot transfer · 0.7fine-tuning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Reconsidering Sentence-Level Sign Language TranslationabstractHistorically, sign language machine translation has been posed as a sentence-level task: datasets consisting of continuous narratives are chopped up and presented to the model as isolated clips.In this work, we explore the limitations of this task framing.First, we survey a number of linguistic phenomena in sign languages that depend on discourse-level context.Then as a case study, we perform the first human baseline for sign language translation that actually substitutes a human into the machine learning task framing, rather than provide the human with the entire document as context.This human baseline-for ASL to English translation on the How2Sign datasetshows that for 33% of sentences in our sample, our fluent Deaf signer annotators were only able to understand key parts of the clip in light of additional discourse-level context.These results underscore the importance of understanding and sanity checking examples when adapting machine learning to new domains. Garrett Tanzer, Max Shengelia, Ken Harrenstien, David Uthus |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2023 | YouTube-ASL: A Large-Scale, Open-Domain American Sign Language-English Parallel CorpusabstractMachine learning for sign languages is bottlenecked by data. In this paper, we present YouTube-ASL, a large-scale, open-domain corpus of American Sign Language (ASL) videos and accompanying English captions drawn from YouTube. With ~1000 hours of videos and >2500 unique signers, YouTube-ASL is ~3x as large and has ~10x as many unique signers as the largest prior ASL dataset. We train baseline models for ASL to English translation on YouTube-ASL and evaluate them on How2Sign, where we achieve a new fine-tuned state of the art of 12.397 BLEU and, for the first time, nontrivial zero-shot results. David Uthus, Garrett Tanzer, Manfred Georg |
NeurIPS | 1 |