Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tianchong Jiang

dblp:350/4857 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 34% Motion planning and robot control · 32% Vision and language · 15%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
goal-conditioned reinforcement learning
0.912025
Progressor: A Perceptually Guided Reward Estimator with Self-Supervised Online Refinement · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward learning
0.912025
Progressor: A Perceptually Guided Reward Estimator with Self-Supervised Online Refinement · ICCV 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.912025
Progressor: A Perceptually Guided Reward Estimator with Self-Supervised Online Refinement · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal reasoning
embodied reasoning
0.812024
Statler: State-Maintaining Language Models for Embodied Reasoning · ICRA 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
long-horizon planning
0.812024
Statler: State-Maintaining Language Models for Embodied Reasoning · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot planning
0.812024
Statler: State-Maintaining Language Models for Embodied Reasoning · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
egocentric video
0.312025
Progressor: A Perceptually Guided Reward Estimator with Self-Supervised Online Refinement · ICCV 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised learning · 0.9progress estimation · 0.9adversarial refinement · 0.9world state estimation · 0.8large language model prompting · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Progressor: A Perceptually Guided Reward Estimator with Self-Supervised Online Refinement
abstract
We present PROGRESSOR, a novel framework that learns a task-agnostic reward function from videos, enabling policy training through goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (RL) without manual supervision. Underlying this reward is an estimate of the distribution over task progress as a function of the current, initial, and goal observations that is learned in a self-supervised fashion. Crucially, PROGRESSOR refines rewards adversarially during online RL training by pushing back predictions for out-of-distribution observations, to mitigate distribution shift inherent in non-expert observations. Utilizing this progress prediction as a dense reward together with an adversarial push-back, we show that PROGRESSOR enables robots to learn complex behaviors without any external supervision. Pretrained on large-scale egocentric human video from EPIC-KITCHENS, PROGRESSOR requires no fine-tuning on in-domain task-specific data for generalization to real-robot offline RL under noisy demonstrations, outperforming contemporary methods that provide dense visual reward for robotic learning. Our findings highlight the potential of PROGRESSOR for scalable robotic applications where direct action labels and task-specific rewards are not readily available.
Tewodros W. Ayalew, Kevin Yuanbo Wu, Tianchong Jiang, Michael Maire, Matthew R. Walter
ICCV4
2025 STACKGEN: Generating Stable Structures from Silhouettes via Diffusion
abstract
Humans naturally obtain intuition about the interactions between and the stability of rigid objects by observing and interacting with the world. It is this intuition that governs the way in which we regularly configure objects in our environment, allowing us to build complex structures from simple, everyday objects. Robotic agents, on the other hand, traditionally require an explicit model of the world that includes the detailed geometry of each object and an analytical model of the environment dynamics, which are difficult to scale and preclude generalization. Instead, robots would benefit from an awareness of intuitive physics that enables them to similarly reason over the stable interaction of objects in their environment. Towards that goal, we propose STACKGEN—a diffusion model that generates diverse stable configurations of building blocks matching a target silhouette. To demonstrate the capability of the method, we evaluate it in a simulated environment and deploy it in the real setting using a robotic arm to assemble structures generated by the model. Our code is available at https://ripl.github.io/StackGen.
Luzhe Sun, Takuma Yoneda, Samuel Wheeler, Tianchong Jiang, Matthew R. Walter
IROS4
2024 Statler: State-Maintaining Language Models for Embodied Reasoning
abstract
There has been a significant research interest in employing large language models to empower intelligent robots with complex reasoning. Existing work focuses on harnessing their abilities to reason about the histories of their actions and observations. In this paper, we explore a new dimension in which large language models may benefit robotics planning. In particular, we propose Statler, a framework in which large language models are prompted to maintain an estimate of the world state, which are often unobservable, and track its transition as new actions are taken. Our framework then conditions each action on the estimate of the current world state. Despite being conceptually simple, our Statler framework significantly outperforms strong competing methods (e.g., Code-as-Policies) on several robot planning tasks. Additionally, it has the potential advantage of scaling up to more challenging long-horizon planning tasks. We release our code here.
Takuma Yoneda, Jiading Fang, Tianchong Jiang, Shengjie Lin, Ben Picker, David Yunis, Hongyuan Mei, Matthew R. Walter
ICRA5