Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Giacomo Fenzi

dblp:350/5799 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3702-1780ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 9 · 2 first-author · 9 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
5 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 52% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 48%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Coding theory · 65% Computational complexity · 35%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
proof systems
1.622025
WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification · EUROCRYPT (4) 2025
Lova: Lattice-Based Folding Scheme from Unstructured Lattices · ASIACRYPT (4) 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
proximity testing
1.622025
WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification · EUROCRYPT (4) 2025
STIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Fewer Queries · CRYPTO (10) 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-solomon codes
1.622025
WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification · EUROCRYPT (4) 2025
STIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Fewer Queries · CRYPTO (10) 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations › cryptographic commitments › polynomial commitment
lattice-based polynomial commitment
1.522024
Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments: Towards Asymptotic and Concrete Efficiency · J. Cryptol. 2024
SLAP: Succinct Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments from Standard Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations › cryptographic commitments
polynomial commitment
1.522024
Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments: Towards Asymptotic and Concrete Efficiency · J. Cryptol. 2024
SLAP: Succinct Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments from Standard Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs
succinct arguments
1.022024
SLAP: Succinct Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments from Standard Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024
Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments: Towards Asymptotic and Concrete Efficiency · J. Cryptol. 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-solomon codes
0.912025
WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification · EUROCRYPT (4) 2025
Computational complexity › property testing › distribution testing
closeness testing
0.912025
WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification · EUROCRYPT (4) 2025
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
folding scheme
0.812024
Lova: Lattice-Based Folding Scheme from Unstructured Lattices · ASIACRYPT (4) 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography
0.812024
Lova: Lattice-Based Folding Scheme from Unstructured Lattices · ASIACRYPT (4) 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography
0.812024
Lova: Lattice-Based Folding Scheme from Unstructured Lattices · ASIACRYPT (4) 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs
0.812024
STIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Fewer Queries · CRYPTO (10) 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
R1CS
0.212024
Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments: Towards Asymptotic and Concrete Efficiency · J. Cryptol. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interactive oracle proofs · 1.7reed-solomon proximity testing · 1.5unstructured lattices · 0.8lattice-based cryptography · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 TensorSwitch: Nearly Optimal Polynomial Commitments from Tensor Codes
Benedikt Bünz, Giacomo Fenzi, Ron Rothblum
CRYPTO (9)2
2025 WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification
Gal Arnon, Alessandro Chiesa, Giacomo Fenzi, Eylon Yogev
EUROCRYPT (4)3
2025 Time-Space Trade-Offs for Sumcheck
Anubhav Baweja, Alessandro Chiesa, Elisabetta Fedele, Giacomo Fenzi, Pratyush Mishra 0001, Tushar Mopuri, Andrew Zitek-Estrada
TCC (4)4
2025 Linear-Time Accumulation Schemes
Benedikt Bünz, Alessandro Chiesa, Giacomo Fenzi
TCC (1)3
2024 Lova: Lattice-Based Folding Scheme from Unstructured Lattices
Giacomo Fenzi, Christian Knabenhans, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen 0001, Duc Tu Pham
ASIACRYPT (4)1
2024 STIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Fewer Queries
Gal Arnon, Alessandro Chiesa, Giacomo Fenzi, Eylon Yogev
CRYPTO (10)3
2024 SLAP: Succinct Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments from Standard Assumptions
Martin R. Albrecht, Giacomo Fenzi, Oleksandra Lapiha, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen 0001
EUROCRYPT (6)2
2024 zkSNARKs in the ROM with Unconditional UC-Security
Alessandro Chiesa, Giacomo Fenzi
TCC (1)2
2024 Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments: Towards Asymptotic and Concrete Efficiency
abstract
Abstract Polynomial commitments schemes are a powerful tool that enables one party to commit to a polynomial p of degree d , and prove that the committed function evaluates to a certain value z at a specified point u , i.e. $$p(u) = z$$ p ( u ) = z , without revealing any additional information about the polynomial. Recently, polynomial commitments have been extensively used as a cryptographic building block to transform polynomial interactive oracle proofs (PIOPs) into efficient succinct arguments. In this paper, we propose a lattice-based polynomial commitment that achieves succinct proof size and verification time in the degree d of the polynomial. Extractability of our scheme holds in the random oracle model under a natural ring version of the BASIS assumption introduced by Wee and Wu (EUROCRYPT 2023). Unlike recent constructions of polynomial commitments by Albrecht et al. (CRYPTO 2022), and by Wee and Wu, we do not require any expensive preprocessing steps, which makes our scheme particularly attractive as an ingredient of a PIOP compiler for succinct arguments. We further instantiate our polynomial commitment, together with the PIOP (EUROCRYPT 2020), to obtain a publicly-verifiable trusted-setup succinct argument for Rank-1 Constraint System (R1CS). Performance-wise, we achieve $$17$$ 17 MB proof size for $$2^{20}$$ 2 20 constraints, which is $$15$$ 15 X smaller than currently the only publicly-verifiable lattice-based SNARK proposed by Albrecht et al.
Giacomo Fenzi, Hossein Moghaddas, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen 0001
J. Cryptol.1