Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Giacomo Fenzi
dblp:350/5799
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3702-1780ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 9 · 2 first-author · 9 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
5 papers |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 52% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 48% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Coding theory · 65% Computational complexity · 35% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
proof systems |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification · EUROCRYPT (4) 2025 Lova: Lattice-Based Folding Scheme from Unstructured Lattices · ASIACRYPT (4) 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
proximity testing |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification · EUROCRYPT (4) 2025 STIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Fewer Queries · CRYPTO (10) 2024 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-solomon codes |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification · EUROCRYPT (4) 2025 STIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Fewer Queries · CRYPTO (10) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations › cryptographic commitments › polynomial commitment
lattice-based polynomial commitment |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments: Towards Asymptotic and Concrete Efficiency · J. Cryptol. 2024 SLAP: Succinct Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments from Standard Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations › cryptographic commitments
polynomial commitment |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments: Towards Asymptotic and Concrete Efficiency · J. Cryptol. 2024 SLAP: Succinct Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments from Standard Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs
succinct arguments |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | SLAP: Succinct Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments from Standard Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024 Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments: Towards Asymptotic and Concrete Efficiency · J. Cryptol. 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-solomon codes |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification · EUROCRYPT (4) 2025 |
Computational complexity › property testing › distribution testing
closeness testing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification · EUROCRYPT (4) 2025 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
folding scheme |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lova: Lattice-Based Folding Scheme from Unstructured Lattices · ASIACRYPT (4) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lova: Lattice-Based Folding Scheme from Unstructured Lattices · ASIACRYPT (4) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lova: Lattice-Based Folding Scheme from Unstructured Lattices · ASIACRYPT (4) 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | STIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Fewer Queries · CRYPTO (10) 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
R1CS |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments: Towards Asymptotic and Concrete Efficiency · J. Cryptol. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interactive oracle proofs · 1.7reed-solomon proximity testing · 1.5unstructured lattices · 0.8lattice-based cryptography · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | TensorSwitch: Nearly Optimal Polynomial Commitments from Tensor Codes
Benedikt Bünz, Giacomo Fenzi, Ron Rothblum |
CRYPTO (9) | 2 |
| 2025 | WHIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Super-Fast Verification
Gal Arnon, Alessandro Chiesa, Giacomo Fenzi, Eylon Yogev |
EUROCRYPT (4) | 3 |
| 2025 | Time-Space Trade-Offs for Sumcheck
Anubhav Baweja, Alessandro Chiesa, Elisabetta Fedele, Giacomo Fenzi, Pratyush Mishra 0001, Tushar Mopuri, Andrew Zitek-Estrada |
TCC (4) | 4 |
| 2025 | Linear-Time Accumulation Schemes
Benedikt Bünz, Alessandro Chiesa, Giacomo Fenzi |
TCC (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | Lova: Lattice-Based Folding Scheme from Unstructured Lattices
Giacomo Fenzi, Christian Knabenhans, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen 0001, Duc Tu Pham |
ASIACRYPT (4) | 1 |
| 2024 | STIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Fewer Queries
Gal Arnon, Alessandro Chiesa, Giacomo Fenzi, Eylon Yogev |
CRYPTO (10) | 3 |
| 2024 | SLAP: Succinct Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments from Standard Assumptions
Martin R. Albrecht, Giacomo Fenzi, Oleksandra Lapiha, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen 0001 |
EUROCRYPT (6) | 2 |
| 2024 | zkSNARKs in the ROM with Unconditional UC-Security
Alessandro Chiesa, Giacomo Fenzi |
TCC (1) | 2 |
| 2024 | Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments: Towards Asymptotic and Concrete EfficiencyabstractAbstract Polynomial commitments schemes are a powerful tool that enables one party to commit to a polynomial p of degree d , and prove that the committed function evaluates to a certain value z at a specified point u , i.e. $$p(u) = z$$ p ( u ) = z , without revealing any additional information about the polynomial. Recently, polynomial commitments have been extensively used as a cryptographic building block to transform polynomial interactive oracle proofs (PIOPs) into efficient succinct arguments. In this paper, we propose a lattice-based polynomial commitment that achieves succinct proof size and verification time in the degree d of the polynomial. Extractability of our scheme holds in the random oracle model under a natural ring version of the BASIS assumption introduced by Wee and Wu (EUROCRYPT 2023). Unlike recent constructions of polynomial commitments by Albrecht et al. (CRYPTO 2022), and by Wee and Wu, we do not require any expensive preprocessing steps, which makes our scheme particularly attractive as an ingredient of a PIOP compiler for succinct arguments. We further instantiate our polynomial commitment, together with the PIOP (EUROCRYPT 2020), to obtain a publicly-verifiable trusted-setup succinct argument for Rank-1 Constraint System (R1CS). Performance-wise, we achieve $$17$$ 17 MB proof size for $$2^{20}$$ 2 20 constraints, which is $$15$$ 15 X smaller than currently the only publicly-verifiable lattice-based SNARK proposed by Albrecht et al. Giacomo Fenzi, Hossein Moghaddas, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen 0001 |
J. Cryptol. | 1 |