Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julius Näumann

dblp:350/7856 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5162-3334ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis › static analysis
cross-language analysis
0.812024
AXA: Cross-Language Analysis through Integration of Single-Language Analyses · ASE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Dynamically Generating Callback Summaries for Enhancing Static Analysis
Steven Arzt, Marc Miltenberger, Julius Näumann
ECOOP3
2024 AXA: Cross-Language Analysis through Integration of Single-Language Analyses
abstract
Modern software is often implemented in multiple interacting programming languages. When performing static analysis of such software, it is desirable to reuse existing single-language analyses to allow access to the results of decades of implementation effort.
Tobias Roth, Julius Näumann, Dominik Helm, Sven Keidel, Mira Mezini
ASE2
2023 Benchmarking the Benchmarks
abstract
Over the years, security researchers have developed a broad spectrum of automatic code scanners that aim to find security vulnerabilities in applications. Security benchmarks are commonly used to evaluate novel scanners or program analysis techniques. Each benchmark consists of multiple positive test cases that reflect typical implementations of vulnerabilities, as well as negative test cases, that reflect secure implementations without security flaws. Based on this ground truth, researchers can demonstrate the recall and precision of their novel contributions.
Marc Miltenberger, Steven Arzt, Philipp Holzinger, Julius Näumann
AsiaCCS4