Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Camille Terrier

dblp:351/0653 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-3693-0862ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational finance and economics
economics
0.712023
Confidence and College Applications: Evidence from a Randomized Intervention · EC 2023
Computational finance and economics
behavioral economics
0.212023
Confidence and College Applications: Evidence from a Randomized Intervention · EC 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomized controlled trial · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Confidence and College Applications: Evidence from a Randomized Intervention
abstract
Access to elite colleges varies drastically based on gender and socioeconomic status (SES). In the U.S., children from top 1% income families are 77 times more likely to attend an elite institution than those from the bottom 20% income bracket [Chetty et al. 2017]. At the same time, females disproportionately enter less selective colleges and lower-paying jobs than men [Blau and Kahn 2017]. We investigate "misconfidence" --- the difference between student perception of their rank in the grade distribution and their real rank in the distribution. It is very common for individuals to have biased beliefs about their own abilities [Möbius et al. 2022]. While several studies show a correlation between confidence and educational choices, there is a lack of causal evidence on the impact of misconfidence on college choices.
Rustamdjan Hakimov, Renke Schmacker, Camille Terrier
EC3