Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniele Lunghi

dblp:351/0848 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-1324-981XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
1.012026
Fraud-RLA: A Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Attack Against Credit Card Fraud Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
evasion attack
1.012026
Fraud-RLA: A Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Attack Against Credit Card Fraud Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Computational finance and economics › fraud detection
credit card fraud detection
0.312026
Fraud-RLA: A Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Attack Against Credit Card Fraud Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Computational finance and economics
fraud detection
0.312026
Fraud-RLA: A Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Attack Against Credit Card Fraud Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Fraud-RLA: A Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Attack Against Credit Card Fraud Detection
abstract
Adversarial attacks pose a significant threat to data-driven systems, and researchers have devoted considerable effort to studying them. Despite its economic relevance, credit card fraud detection has received comparatively little attention. To address this gap, we propose a novel threat model that highlights the limitations of existing attacks and motivates new approaches. We introduce Fraud-RLA, an adversarial attack against credit card Fraud Detection Systems that leverages Reinforcement Learning to evade detection. Fraud-RLA is designed to maximize the amount stolen by optimizing the exploration-exploitation trade-off while requiring substantially less prior knowledge than competing methods. Our experiments on a realistic Fraud Detection System show that Fraud-RLA is effective, even under the severe limitations imposed by our threat model.
Daniele Lunghi, Yannick Molinghen, Alkis Simitsis, Tom Lenaerts, Gianluca Bontempi
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.1
2024 Assessing adversarial attacks in real-world fraud detection
abstract
In the digital economy, the growing demand for data sharing and trading makes data a critical asset. To facilitate data acquisition between data owners and data buyers, tools such as data markets have emerged. Such modern data ecosystems typically comprise several interconnected components, often based on machine learning. Unfortunately, as practice has shown, such components are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Lacking proper security assessment measures is a severe limitation for the success of data markets. In this paper, we delve into the challenges posed by adversarial attacks using credit card fraud detection as an example use case. We show that popular techniques such as penetration testing through existing adversarial attacks is not a viable approach, and corroborate our analysis by showing how a naive random sample attack outperforms all tested methods when considering the specifics of the fraud detection problem. Motivated by this result, we propose alternative assessment approaches and discuss promising research directions for increasing our understanding of models’ robustness.
Daniele Lunghi, Alkis Simitsis, Gianluca Bontempi
ICWS1