Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jerry Ngo

dblp:351/8330 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 77% Speech recognition and synthesis · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
audio embeddings
0.212024
What Do Language Models Hear? Probing for Auditory Representations in Language Models · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear probe · 0.8contrastive learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 What Do Language Models Hear? Probing for Auditory Representations in Language Models
abstract
This work explores whether language models encode meaningfully grounded representations of sounds of objects.We learn a linear probe that retrieves the correct text representation of an object given a snippet of audio related to that object, where the sound representation is given by a pretrained audio model.This probe is trained via a contrastive loss that pushes the language representations and sound representations of an object to be close to one another.After training, the probe is tested on its ability to generalize to objects that were not seen during training.Across different language models and audio models, we find that the probe generalization is above chance in many cases, indicating that despite being trained only on raw text, language models encode grounded knowledge of sounds for some objects.
Jerry Ngo
ACL (1)1