Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kijun Choi

dblp:351/9650 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0008-9178-1848ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
0.712023
Practice and Challenges in Building a Business-oriented Search Engine Quality Metric · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › relevance feedback
click feedback
0.212023
Practice and Challenges in Building a Business-oriented Search Engine Quality Metric · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval
user behavior
0.212023
Practice and Challenges in Building a Business-oriented Search Engine Quality Metric · SIGIR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.7explainable boosting machine · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Practice and Challenges in Building a Business-oriented Search Engine Quality Metric
abstract
One of the most challenging aspects of operating a large-scale web search engine is to accurately evaluate and monitor the search engine's result quality regardless of search types. From a business perspective, in the face of such challenges, it is important to establish a universal search quality metric that can be easily understood by the entire organisation. In this paper, we introduce a model-based quality metric using Explainable Boosting Machine as the classifier and online user behaviour signals as features to predict search quality. The proposed metric takes into account a variety of search types and has good interpretability. To examine the performance of the metric, we constructed a large dataset of user behaviour on search engine results pages (SERPs) with SERP quality ratings from professional annotators. We compared the performance of the model in our metric to those of other black-box machine learning models on the dataset. We also share a few experiences within our company for the org-wide adoption of this metric relevant to metric design.
Nuo Chen 0004, Donghyun Park, Hyungae Park, Kijun Choi, Tetsuya Sakai
SIGIR4