Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Che Cheng

dblp:352/8656 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-9126-3239ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 87% Computational complexity · 13%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
stochastic boolean satisfiability
1.422024
Knowledge Compilation for Incremental and Checkable Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability · IJCAI 2024
Lifting (D)QBF Preprocessing and Solving Techniques to (D)SSAT · AAAI 2023
Computational complexity
counting complexity
1.012026
Model Counting for Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas · AAAI 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
dependency quantified boolean formula
1.012026
Model Counting for Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas · AAAI 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
quantified boolean formula
1.012026
Model Counting for Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas · AAAI 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
symbolic model checking
1.012026
Model Counting for Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas · AAAI 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking
knowledge compilation
0.812024
Knowledge Compilation for Incremental and Checkable Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability · IJCAI 2024
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.712023
Lifting (D)QBF Preprocessing and Solving Techniques to (D)SSAT · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic model checking · 1.0propositional model counting · 1.0preprocessing · 0.7dependency elimination · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Model Counting for Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas
abstract
Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas (DQBF) generalize QBF by explicitly specifying which universal variables each existential variable depends on, instead of relying on a linear quantifier order. The satisfiability problem of DQBF is NEXP-complete, and many hard problems can be succinctly encoded as DQBF. Recent work has revealed a strong analogy between DQBF and SAT: k-DQBF (with k existential variables) is a succinct form of k-SAT, and satisfiability is NEXP-complete for 3-DQBF but PSPACE-complete for 2-DQBF, mirroring the complexity gap between 3-SAT (NP-complete) and 2-SAT (NL-complete). Motivated by this analogy, we study the model counting problem for DQBF, denoted #DQBF. Our main theoretical result is that #2-DQBF is #EXP-complete, where #EXP is the exponential-time analogue of #P. This parallels Valiant's classical theorem stating that #2-SAT is #P-complete. As a direct application, we show that first-order model counting (FOMC) remains #EXP-complete even when restricted to a PSPACE-decidable fragment of first-order logic and domain size two. Building on recent successes in reducing 2-DQBF satisfiability to symbolic model checking, we develop a dedicated 2-DQBF model counter. Using a diverse set of crafted instances, we experimentally evaluated it against a baseline that expands 2-DQBF formulas into propositional formulas and applies propositional model counting. While the baseline worked well when each existential variable depends on few variables, our implementation scaled significantly better to larger dependency sets.
Long-Hin Fung, Che Cheng, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang, Friedrich Slivovsky, Tony Tan
AAAI2
2025 Unifying DQMax#SAT and DSSAT: Polynomial-Time Reduction and Applications
Ilo Chen, Che Cheng, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang
FMCAD2
2025 Fine-Grained Complexity Analysis of Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas
Che Cheng, Long-Hin Fung, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang, Friedrich Slivovsky, Tony Tan
SAT1
2024 2-DQBF Solving and Certification via Property-Directed Reachability Analysis
Long-Hin Fung, Che Cheng, Yu-Wei Fan, Tony Tan, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang
FMCAD2
2024 Knowledge Compilation for Incremental and Checkable Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability
Che Cheng, Yun-Rong Luo, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang
IJCAI1
2023 Lifting (D)QBF Preprocessing and Solving Techniques to (D)SSAT
abstract
Dependency stochastic Boolean satisfiability (DSSAT) generalizes stochastic Boolean satisfiability (SSAT) in existential variables being Henkinized allowing their dependencies on randomized variables to be explicitly specified. It allows NEXPTIME problems of reasoning under uncertainty and partial information to be compactly encoded. To date, no decision procedure has been implemented for solving DSSAT formulas. This work provides the first such tool by converting DSSAT into SSAT with dependency elimination, similar to converting dependency quantified Boolean formula (DQBF) to quantified Boolean formula (QBF). Moreover, we extend (D)QBF preprocessing techniques and implement the first standalone (D)SSAT preprocessor. Experimental results show that solving DSSAT via dependency elimination is highly applicable and that existing SSAT solvers may benefit from preprocessing.
Che Cheng, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang
AAAI1
2023 WolFEx: Word-Level Function Extraction and Simplification from Gate-Level Arithmetic Circuits
abstract
Extracting word-level functions from gate-level circuits is challenging and crucial in security, synthesis, and verification applications. State-of-the-art approaches identify subcircuits to match against a predefined library of components. However, they fail for highly-optimized arithmetic circuits due to the absence of intermediate word structures and the high complexity of verifying arithmetic functions. The challenge of learning arithmetic operations from gate-level netlists is posed in the 2022 ICCAD CAD Contest. This work tackles the challenge by devising and combining algebraic, statistical, and structural techniques into an operational flow for function extraction and simplification. Beyond the contest setting, our method also deals with circuits without their input-and output-pin information. Experiments on the contest benchmarks show that our method outperforms the winning teams in the contest in both the number of solved cases and the compactness of the extracted word-level expressions. Moreover, our method can effectively extract most word-level functions within 10 minutes.
Kuo-Wei Ho, Shao-Ting Chung, Tian-Fu Chen, Yu-Wei Fan, Che Cheng, Cheng-Han Liu, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang
ICCAD5
2023 A Resolution Proof System for Dependency Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability
Yun-Rong Luo, Che Cheng, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang
J. Autom. Reason.2