Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly automate software engineering tasks. While recent studies highlight the accelerated adoption of “AI as a teammate” in Open Source Software (OSS), developer interaction patterns remain under-explored. In this work, we investigated project-level guidelines and developers’ interactions with AI-assisted pull requests (PRs) by expanding the AIDev dataset to include finer-grained contributor code ownership and a comparative baseline of human-created PRs. We found that over 67.5% of AI-co-authored PRs originate from contributors without prior code ownership. Despite this, the majority of repositories lack guidelines for AI-coding agent usage. Notably, we observed a distinct interaction pattern: AI-co-authored PRs are merged significantly faster with minimal feedback. In contrast to human-created PRs where non-owner developers receive the most feedback, AI-co-authored PRs from non-owners receive the least, with approximately 80% merged without any explicit review. Finally, we discuss implications for developers and researchers.

Pre-trained models (PTMs) have gained widespread popularity and achieved remarkable success across various fields, driven by their groundbreaking performance and easy accessibility through hosting providers. However, the challenges faced by downstream developers in reusing PTMs in software systems are less explored. To bridge this knowledge gap, we qualitatively created and analyzed a dataset of 840 PTM-related issue reports from 31 OSS GitHub projects. We systematically developed a comprehensive taxonomy of PTM-related challenges that developers face in downstream projects. Our study identifies seven key categories of challenges that downstream developers face in reusing PTMs, such as model usage, model performance, and output quality. We also compared our findings with existing taxonomies. Additionally, we conducted a resolution time analysis and, based on statistical tests, found that PTM-related issues take significantly longer to be resolved than issues unrelated to PTMs, with significant variation across challenge categories. We discuss the implications of our findings for practitioners and possibilities for future research.

Iterative approaches like Agile Scrum are commonly adopted to enhance the software development process. However, challenges such as schedule and budget overruns still persist in many software projects. Several approaches employ machine learning techniques, particularly classification, to facilitate decision-making in iterative software development. Existing approaches often concentrate on characterizing a sprint to predict solely productivity. We introduce Sprint2Vec, which leverages three aspects of sprint information – sprint attributes, issue attributes, and the developers involved in a sprint, to comprehensively characterize it for predicting both productivity and quality outcomes of the sprints. Our approach combines traditional feature extraction techniques with automated deep learning-based unsupervised feature learning techniques. We utilize methods like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to enhance our feature learning process. This enables us to learn features from unstructured data, such as textual descriptions of issues and sequences of developer activities. We conducted an evaluation of our approach on two regression tasks: predicting the deliverability (i.e., the amount of work delivered from a sprint) and quality of a sprint (i.e., the amount of delivered work that requires rework). The evaluation results on five well-known open-source projects (Apache, Atlassian, Jenkins, Spring, and Talendforge) demonstrate our approach's superior performance compared to baseline and alternative approaches.