Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yeonseok Jeong

dblp:354/7322 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-0909-2059ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 54% Knowledge graphs · 46%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document retrieval
reasoning-intensive retrieval
1.012026
Beyond Markovian Forgetfulness: Episodic Memory for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › domain-specific summarization
narrative summarization
0.912025
Agent-as-Judge for Factual Summarization of Long Narratives · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.912025
Agent-as-Judge for Factual Summarization of Long Narratives · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.912025
Agent-as-Judge for Factual Summarization of Long Narratives · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
factuality evaluation
0.312025
Agent-as-Judge for Factual Summarization of Long Narratives · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state-based retrieval · 2.0chain-of-thought · 2.0agent-as-judge · 1.7LLM-as-a-judge · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Beyond Markovian Forgetfulness: Episodic Memory for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval
abstract
Reasoning-intensive information retrieval uses large language models to solve complex queries via multi-step reasoning.However, existing methods have critical limitations.Chain-of-Thought (CoT) approaches suffer from inefficiency, while state-based methods, despite better token efficiency, often fall into reasoning cycles that trap the query refinement process.To address these issues, we propose Episodic Memory for Retrieval (EMR), which enhances the state-based framework with an episodic memory.This module stores the full history of prior states for a query, allowing the model to avoid repetition of such cycles.Experiments on the BRIGHT benchmark show that EMR consistently outperforms both CoT and state-based baselines.Moreover, it is highly token-efficient, reducing token usage by 72% on average.Our results show that episodic memory is an effective and tokenefficient mechanism for reasoning-intensive retrieval.The gains also generalize across different base models and stay efficient in terms of end-to-end latency.The code is available in https://github.com/ldilab/EMR.
Dohyeon Lee, Yeonseok Jeong, Seung-won Hwang
ACL (1)2
2025 Agent-as-Judge for Factual Summarization of Long Narratives
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated near-human performance in summarization tasks based on traditional metrics such as ROUGE and BERTScore.However, these metrics do not adequately capture critical aspects of summarization quality, such as factual accuracy, particularly for long narratives (>100K tokens).Recent advances, such as LLM-as-a-Judge, address the limitations of metrics based on lexical similarity but still exhibit factual inconsistencies, especially in understanding character relationships and states.In this work, we introduce NARRATIVEFACTSCORE (NFS), the first "Agent-as-a-Judge" framework that evaluates and refines factuality in narrative summarization.By leveraging a Character Knowledge Graph (CKG) extracted from input narrative, NARRATIVEFACTSCORE evaluates the factuality and provides actionable guidance for refinement, such as identifying missing or erroneous facts.Our experimental results demonstrate that constructing the CKG enables reasoning with 1/3 of the factuality computation used in the prior approach, and achieve three times higher correlation with human judgments.Furthermore, refinement with actionable guidance improves the quality of the summary. 1
Yeonseok Jeong, Seung-won Hwang, Byung-Hak Kim
EMNLP1
2023 On Monotonic Aggregation for Open-domain QA
Sang-eun Han, Yeonseok Jeong, Seung-won Hwang, Kyungjae Lee 0002
INTERSPEECH2