Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aishwarya Ramasethu

dblp:354/9415 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Language models and text generation · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.912025
Risk Management for Mitigating Benchmark Failure Modes: BenchRisk · NeurIPS 2025
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.812024
Optimizing Noise for f-Differential Privacy via Anti-Concentration and Stochastic Dominance · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › relaxed differential privacy
f-differential privacy
0.812024
Optimizing Noise for f-Differential Privacy via Anti-Concentration and Stochastic Dominance · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › noise addition
noise calibration
0.812024
Optimizing Noise for f-Differential Privacy via Anti-Concentration and Stochastic Dominance · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

risk management process · 0.9metaevaluation scoring · 0.9stochastic dominance · 0.8anti-concentration inequalities · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Risk Management for Mitigating Benchmark Failure Modes: BenchRisk
abstract
Large language model (LLM) benchmarks inform LLM use decisions (e.g., "is this LLM safe to deploy for my use case and context?"). However, benchmarks may be rendered unreliable by various failure modes impacting benchmark bias, variance, coverage, or people's capacity to understand benchmark evidence. Using the National Institute of Standards and Technology's risk management process as a foundation, this research iteratively analyzed 26 popular benchmarks, identifying 57 potential failure modes and 196 corresponding mitigation strategies. The mitigations reduce failure likelihood and/or severity, providing a frame for evaluating "benchmark risk," which is scored to provide a metaevaluation benchmark: BenchRisk. Higher scores indicate benchmark users are less likely to reach an incorrect or unsupported conclusion about an LLM. All 26 scored benchmarks present significant risk within one or more of the five scored dimensions (comprehensiveness, intelligibility, consistency, correctness, and longevity), which points to important open research directions for the field of LLM benchmarking. The BenchRisk workflow allows for comparison between benchmarks; as an open-source tool, it also facilitates the identification and sharing of risks and their mitigations.
Sean McGregor, Vassil Tashev, Armstrong Foundjem, Aishwarya Ramasethu, Sadegh AlMahdi Kazemi Zarkouei, Chris Knotz, Kongtao Chen, Alicia Parrish, Anka Reuel, Heather Frase
NeurIPS4
2024 Optimizing Noise for f-Differential Privacy via Anti-Concentration and Stochastic Dominance
abstract
In this paper, we establish anti-concentration inequalities for additive noise mechanisms which achieve $f$-differential privacy ($f$-DP), a notion of privacy phrased in terms of a tradeoff function $f$ which limits the ability of an adversary to determine which individuals were in the database. We show that canonical noise distributions (CNDs), proposed by Awan and Vadhan (2023), match the anti-concentration bounds at half-integer values, indicating that their tail behavior is near-optimal. We also show that all CNDs are sub-exponential, regardless of the $f$-DP guarantee. In the case of log-concave CNDs, we show that they are the stochastically smallest noise compared to any other noise distributions with the same strong privacy guarantee. In terms of integer-valued noise, we propose a new notion of discrete CND and prove that a discrete CND always exists, can be constructed by rounding a continuous CND, and that the discrete CND is unique when designed for a statistic with sensitivity 1. We further show that the discrete CND at sensitivity 1 is stochastically smallest compared to other integer-valued noises. Our theoretical results shed light on the different types of privacy guarantees possible in the $f$-DP framework and can be incorporated in more complex mechanisms to optimize performance.
Jordan Awan, Aishwarya Ramasethu
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2