Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Senyao Yu

dblp:355/0722 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-3088-8923ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 85% Services computing and microservices · 15%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › mutation testing › fault injection
fault injection testing
1.522025
A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Injection Testing of Microservice Systems · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025
Enhancing Fault Injection Testing of Service Systems via Fault-Tolerance Bottleneck · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023
Services computing and microservices › microservice architecture
microservice system
0.312025
A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Injection Testing of Microservice Systems · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.212023
Enhancing Fault Injection Testing of Service Systems via Fault-Tolerance Bottleneck · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fault injection · 1.3systematic literature review · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Injection Testing of Microservice Systems
abstract
This paper presents the first comprehensive review of techniques that pertain to Fault Injection Testing (FIT) of Microservice systems. FIT is a popular resilience engineering technique for examining the correctness and robustness of fault-tolerance mechanisms in software systems. Despite its wide adoption in building Microservice systems of high reliability, the techniques and tools that underpin effective fault injection have not yet been systematically reviewed. To this end, a general FIT framework that consists of five key components is first summarized, with each component indicating a key design decision that should be carefully determined. Then, a systematic literature review (SLR) is performed to investigate the current practices that address the challenges associated with each of these components. Finally, the potential limitations and future research directions of FIT for Microservice systems are discussed.
Senyao Yu, Huayao Wu, Xintao Niu, Changhai Nie
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput.1
2023 Enhancing Fault Injection Testing of Service Systems via Fault-Tolerance Bottleneck
abstract
Modern large-scale service systems are usually deployed with redundant components to ensure high dependability in distributed and volatile environments. Fault Injection Testing (FIT) is a popular technique for testing such systems, while the application of FIT to validating the correctness of redundant components remains a challenging task, especially when the system's structural information is unavailable when testing starts. In this study, we refer to a minimum set of faults that, when injected, will cut off all execution paths in a service system as afault-tolerance bottleneck, and we propose a novel Fault-tolerance Bottleneck driven Fault Injection (FBFI) approach to the exploration and validation of redundant components without prior knowledge of the system's business structure. The core idea of FBFI is to iteratively infer and inject bottlenecks of the business structure constructed so far. In this way, FBFI is able to discover and test redundant components by repeatedly triggering new system behaviors. The effectiveness and efficiency of FBFI is evaluated using two microservice benchmark systems with different deployment scales. The results reveal that FBFI is more practical and cost-effective than random and lineage-driven FIT approaches in testing service systems of high redundancy levels.
Huayao Wu, Senyao Yu, Xintao Niu, Changhai Nie, Yu Pei 0001, Qiang He 0001, Yun Yang 0001
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2