Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhexiong Li

dblp:355/8825 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 69% Parallel and multicore computing · 31%
Computer networks
1 paper
Edge and fog computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
serverless computing
1.012026
Lazy but Efficient: Layer-Wise Task Scheduling with Lazy Pulling for Fast Serverless Inference · INFOCOM 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing › serverless computing
serverless inference
1.012026
Lazy but Efficient: Layer-Wise Task Scheduling with Lazy Pulling for Fast Serverless Inference · INFOCOM 2026
Parallel and multicore computing
task scheduling
1.012026
Lazy but Efficient: Layer-Wise Task Scheduling with Lazy Pulling for Fast Serverless Inference · INFOCOM 2026
Edge and fog computing
edge cloud
0.712023
Layered Structure Aware Dependent Microservice Placement Toward Cost Efficient Edge Clouds · INFOCOM 2023
Edge and fog computing › mobile edge computing › service placement
microservice placement
0.712023
Layered Structure Aware Dependent Microservice Placement Toward Cost Efficient Edge Clouds · INFOCOM 2023
Services computing and microservices › microservice architecture
microservice deployment
0.712023
Layered Structure Aware Dependent Microservice Placement Toward Cost Efficient Edge Clouds · INFOCOM 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference serving
0.312026
Lazy but Efficient: Layer-Wise Task Scheduling with Lazy Pulling for Fast Serverless Inference · INFOCOM 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.212023
Layered Structure Aware Dependent Microservice Placement Toward Cost Efficient Edge Clouds · INFOCOM 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lazy pulling · 2.0layer-wise scheduling · 2.0randomized rounding · 2.0quadratic integer programming · 2.0approximation algorithm · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Lazy but Efficient: Layer-Wise Task Scheduling with Lazy Pulling for Fast Serverless Inference
Zhexiong Li, Hongmin Geng, Yuepeng Li, Lin Gu 0002, Deze Zeng
INFOCOM1
2026 PSN-PATH: When Multipath RDMA Meets Lossy Networks
Zhexiong Li, Shugui Wei, Puyu Zhao, Yuepeng Li, Lin Gu 0002, Deze Zeng, Xiaoliang Wang 0001, Laiping Zhao
SIGCOMM1
2025 Common DNN Layer Sharing aware Task Scheduling for Inference Acceleration in Serverless Edge Computing
abstract
Serverless edge computing, characterized by fine-grained resource allocation and rapid task scheduling, is effectively implemented in edge clouds to support a diverse array of Deep Neural Network (DNN) based inference tasks. However, before executing inference tasks, the system needs to load DNN models into a container, a process known as cold start. The cold start introduces significant latency, thereby prolonging the task completion time. In particular, model loading time constitutes approximately 50%–70% of the overall task lifecycle, making it comparable to the duration of inference execution. Fortunately, we notice that some layers are required by multiple models and only need to be loaded once if these tasks are scheduled onto one server, i.e., DNN layer sharing. However, the computational resource differences among edge servers and their limited memory capacity make task scheduling and layer loading decisions particularly challenging. Therefore, to fully leverage the potential of DNN layer sharing, we investigate the Layer Sharing aware Task Scheduling (LSTS) problem with the goal of minimizing the task completion time. We formulate it into a Quadratic Integer Programming (QIP) problem and linearize it into an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) form, which is then proved as NP-hard. To tackle the computation complexity, we propose a Randomized Rounding-based Layer-Sharing-Aware Task Scheduling algorithm (LSTS-RR). Through comprehensive experimental evaluations, we confirm the effectiveness of our algorithm, as it reduces task completion time by more than 36% compared to other state-of-the-art approaches across a range of widely recognized DNN models.
Yanfei Xu, Zhexiong Li, Deze Zeng, Lin Gu 0002
ICCCN2
2025 DCTS-RDMA: Adaptive FEC via Dynamic Coding for Efficient RDMA over Lossy Networks
Zhiyi Yang, Zhexiong Li, Deze Zeng, Lin Gu 0002
NPC (1)2
2024 WebAssembly or Container? Joint Optimization of Microservice Consolidation and Deployment towards Cost Efficient Edge-End Consortium
abstract
Edge-End Consortium, with the integration of edge computing servers and end devices like IoT devices, has emerged as a promising infrastructure for on-site computing power provision. But the high heterogeneity has raised unprecedented challenges in its resource management and task scheduling. Both WebAssembly and Container provide lightweight and portable way to consolidate and deploy microservices to combat the heterogeneity problem. However, the inherent advantages and disadvantages of WebAssembly and Container make it nontrivial to decide the microservice consolidation way and the deployment site, especially in the consideration of dependency between microservices. In this paper, we investigate the problem of mixed deployment of WebAssembly and Container based dependent microservices to strike a balance between communication and deployment cost toward high overall cost efficiency. We first cast this problem into a Quadratic Integer Programming (QIP) formulation and prove it as NP-hard. We then introduce a Randomized Rounding WebAssembly and Containerized Microservice Deployment (RR-WCMD) algorithm with polynomial computation complexity and guaranteed performance efficiency. Experiment results show that RR-WCMD can significantly lower the cost by an average of 34% in comparison with state-of-theart algorithms, thanks to the joint consideration of consolidation way and deployment site.
Zhexiong Li, Deze Zeng, Ranzhao Chen
IWQoS1
2023 Layered Structure Aware Dependent Microservice Placement Toward Cost Efficient Edge Clouds
abstract
Although the containers are featured by light-weightness, it is still resource-consuming to pull and startup a large container image, especially in relatively resource-constrained edge cloud. Fortunately, Docker, as the most widely used container, provides a unique layered architecture that allows the same layer to be shared between microservices so as to lower the deployment cost. Meanwhile, it is highly desirable to deploy dependent microservices of an application together to lower the operation cost. Therefore, the balancing of microservice deployment cost and the operation cost should be considered comprehensively to achieve minimal overall cost of an on-demand application. In this paper, we first formulate this problem into a Quadratic Integer Programming form (QIP) and prove it as a NP-hard problem. We further propose a Randomized Rounding-based Microservice Deployment and Layer Pulling (RR-MDLP) algorithm with low computation complexity and guaranteed approximation ratio. Through extensive experiments, we verify the high efficiency of our algorithm by the fact that it significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art microservice deployment strategies.
Deze Zeng, Hongmin Geng, Lin Gu 0002, Zhexiong Li
INFOCOM4