Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Congyi Li
dblp:356/6686
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-1727-1590ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 80% Privacy and data protection · 20% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 64% Language models and text generation · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 11% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack › backdoor defense
backdoor detection |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | HEFLGuard: Backdoor Detection in Homomorphic Encryption-Based Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 UMA: Facilitating Backdoor Scanning via Unlearning-Based Model Ablation · AAAI 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › federated learning defense
federated learning backdoor detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | HEFLGuard: Backdoor Detection in Homomorphic Encryption-Based Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning › federated learning privacy
homomorphic encryption for federated learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | HEFLGuard: Backdoor Detection in Homomorphic Encryption-Based Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
model intellectual property protection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | FedWM: Data-Free Watermarking for Model Ownership Protection in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
model stealing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | FedWM: Data-Free Watermarking for Model Ownership Protection in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection
ownership verification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | FedWM: Data-Free Watermarking for Model Ownership Protection in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | HEFLGuard: Backdoor Detection in Homomorphic Encryption-Based Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › federated learning security
watermarking for federated learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | FedWM: Data-Free Watermarking for Model Ownership Protection in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
backdoor attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | UMA: Facilitating Backdoor Scanning via Unlearning-Based Model Ablation · AAAI 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack
backdoor defense |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | UMA: Facilitating Backdoor Scanning via Unlearning-Based Model Ablation · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
faithfulness evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Good-looking but Lacking Faithfulness: Understanding Local Explanation Methods through Trend-based Testing · CCS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Good-looking but Lacking Faithfulness: Understanding Local Explanation Methods through Trend-based Testing · CCS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
local explanation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Good-looking but Lacking Faithfulness: Understanding Local Explanation Methods through Trend-based Testing · CCS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | FedWM: Data-Free Watermarking for Model Ownership Protection in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Good-looking but Lacking Faithfulness: Understanding Local Explanation Methods through Trend-based Testing · CCS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Good-looking but Lacking Faithfulness: Understanding Local Explanation Methods through Trend-based Testing · CCS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
substitute data · 2.0logits alignment · 2.0dynamic optimization · 2.0homomorphic encryption · 1.0consistency verification · 1.0byzantine fault-tolerant aggregation · 1.0unlearning-based model ablation · 0.8dynamic trigger optimization · 0.8trend-based testing · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | FedWM: Data-Free Watermarking for Model Ownership Protection in Federated LearningabstractThe widespread adoption of federated learning has been driven by growing demands for privacy protection in model training. Federated learning enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model coordinated by a central server without sharing their raw data. However, when distributing the global model to clients, the central server faces significant security risks from malicious clients who may steal and misuse the model, thereby compromising its ownership. While existing watermarking techniques typically rely on main task data for ownership protection, their application in federated learning is limited since the server lacks access to this data, which remains with the clients. To address this challenge, we propose a novel data-free watermarking method. We utilize substitute data unrelated to the main task and improve efficiency by filtering out redundant samples. To optimize the watermarking process, we introduce a logits alignment-based optimization strategy that uses the substitute dataset with watermark triggers for effective embedding. Additionally, we propose a dynamic optimization algorithm to balance the trade-off between watermark embedding and main task. We comprehensively evaluate our approach across four datasets, four model architectures, and three mainstream deep learning tasks. Our experimental results demonstrate nearly perfect watermark performance while maintaining minimal impact on the main task. Notably, our watermarking method proves resistant to existing backdoor detection techniques, establishing its effectiveness, robustness and stealthiness. Congyi Li, Peizhuo Lv, Xuejing Yuan, Shengzhi Zhang, Kai Chen 0012, Yingjiu Li |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 1 |
| 2026 | HEFLGuard: Backdoor Detection in Homomorphic Encryption-Based Federated LearningabstractHomomorphic encryption-based federated learning (HEFL) strengthens privacy by aggregating encrypted model updates, but it also renders existing backdoor defenses that assume plaintext updates inapplicable. We present HEFLGuard, a single-server backdoor detection framework for HEFL in which the server constructs overlapping validation models from encrypted client groups and clients locally compare logits of the global and validation models on benign samples to expose backdoor behavior. HEFLGuard further combines consistency verification across non-IID validation groups with Byzantine fault-tolerant aggregation of client reports, ensuring robustness under heterogeneous data and Byzantine participants. We evaluate HEFLGuard on seven vision/text benchmarks under three backdoor types across IID and non-IID settings. HEFLGuard consistently reduces ASR from near 100% to nearly the nobackdoor level while keeping the drop in clean accuracy within 2.5%. Compared with prior work, HEFLGuard achieves higher robustness and deployability. Congyi Li, Peizhuo Lv, Jinwen He, Kai Chen 0012 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |
| 2024 | UMA: Facilitating Backdoor Scanning via Unlearning-Based Model AblationabstractRecent advances in backdoor attacks, like leveraging complex triggers or stealthy implanting techniques, have introduced new challenges in backdoor scanning, limiting the usability of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in various scenarios. In this paper, we propose Unlearning-based Model Ablation (UMA), a novel approach to facilitate backdoor scanning and defend against advanced backdoor attacks. UMA filters out backdoor-irrelevant features by ablating the inherent features of the target class within the model and subsequently reveals the backdoor through dynamic trigger optimization. We evaluate our method on 1700 models (700 benign and 1000 trojaned) with 6 model structures, 7 different backdoor attacks and 4 datasets. Our results demonstrate that the proposed methodology effectively detect these advanced backdoors. Specifically, our method can achieve 91% AUC-ROC and 86.6% detection accuracy on average, which outperforms the baselines, including Neural Cleanse, ABS, K-Arm and MNTD. Yue Zhao 0018, Congyi Li, Kai Chen 0012 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2023 | Good-looking but Lacking Faithfulness: Understanding Local Explanation Methods through Trend-based TestingabstractWhile enjoying the great achievements brought by deep learning (DL), people are also worried about the decision made by DL models, since the high degree of non-linearity of DL models makes the decision extremely difficult to understand. Consequently, attacks such as adversarial attacks are easy to carry out, but difficult to detect and explain, which has led to a boom in the research on local explanation methods for explaining model decisions. In this paper, we evaluate the faithfulness of explanation methods and find that traditional tests on faithfulness encounter the random dominance problem, i.e., the random selection performs the best, especially for complex data. To further solve this problem, we propose three trend-based faithfulness tests and empirically demonstrate that the new trend tests can better assess faithfulness than traditional tests on image, natural language and security tasks. We implement the assessment system and evaluate ten popular explanation methods. Benefiting from the trend tests, we successfully assess the explanation methods on complex data for the first time, bringing unprecedented discoveries and inspiring future research. Downstream tasks also greatly benefit from the tests. For example, model debugging equipped with faithful explanation methods performs much better for detecting and correcting accuracy and security problems. Jinwen He, Kai Chen 0012, Guozhu Meng, Jiangshan Zhang, Congyi Li |
CCS | 5 |