Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arkadeep Acharya

dblp:356/7885 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-3018-3541ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 54% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 39% Vision and language · 7%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
cross-modal retrieval
0.912025
M3Retrieve: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval for Medicine · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.712023
Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
temporal commonsense reasoning
0.712023
Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
temporal reasoning
0.712023
Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models › reasoning evaluation
temporal reasoning benchmark
0.712023
Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.312025
M3Retrieve: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval for Medicine · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark
0.312025
M3Retrieve: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval for Medicine · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
0.312025
M3Retrieve: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval for Medicine · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › neural summarization
LLM-based summarization
0.212024
CLIPSyntel: CLIP and LLM Synergy for Multimodal Question Summarization in Healthcare · AAAI 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal understanding
0.212024
CLIPSyntel: CLIP and LLM Synergy for Multimodal Question Summarization in Healthcare · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal retrieval models · 2.6large language model · 1.5CLIP · 1.5prompting strategies · 0.7benchmarking · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 M3Retrieve: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval for Medicine
abstract
With the increasing use of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), strong retrieval models have become more important than ever.In healthcare, multimodal retrieval models that combine information from both text and images offer major advantages for many downstream tasks such as question answering, cross-modal retrieval, and multimodal summarization, since medical data often includes both formats.However, there is currently no standard benchmark to evaluate how well these models perform in medical settings.To address this gap, we introduce M3Retrieve, a Multimodal Medical Retrieval Benchmark.M3Retrieve, spans 5 domains,16 medical fields, and 4 distinct tasks, with over 1.2 Million text documents and 164K multimodal queries, all collected under approved licenses.We evaluate leading multimodal retrieval models on this benchmark to explore the challenges specific to different medical specialities and to understand their impact on retrieval performance.By releasing M3Retrieve, we aim to enable systematic evaluation, foster model innovation, and accelerate research toward building more capable and reliable multimodal retrieval systems for medical applications.
Arkadeep Acharya, Akash Ghosh, Pradeepika Verma, Kitsuchart Pasupa, Sriparna Saha 0001, Priti Singh
EMNLP1
2025 Benchmarking and Building Zero-Shot Hindi Retrieval Model with Hindi-BEIR and NLLB-E5
abstract
Arkadeep Acharya, Rudra Murthy, Vishwajeet Kumar, Jaydeep Sen. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Arkadeep Acharya, Rudra Murthy, Vishwajeet Kumar, Jaydeep Sen
NAACL (Long Papers)1
2024 CLIPSyntel: CLIP and LLM Synergy for Multimodal Question Summarization in Healthcare
abstract
In the era of modern healthcare, swiftly generating medical question summaries is crucial for informed and timely patient care. Despite the increasing complexity and volume of medical data, existing studies have focused solely on text-based summarization, neglecting the integration of visual information. Recognizing the untapped potential of combining textual queries with visual representations of medical conditions, we introduce the Multimodal Medical Question Summarization (MMQS) Dataset. This dataset, a major contribution of our work, pairs medical queries with visual aids, facilitating a richer and more nuanced understanding of patient needs. We also propose a framework, utilizing the power of Contrastive Language Image Pretraining(CLIP) and Large Language Models(LLMs), consisting of four modules that identify medical disorders, generate relevant context, filter medical concepts, and craft visually aware summaries. Our comprehensive framework harnesses the power of CLIP, a multimodal foundation model, and various general-purpose LLMs, comprising four main modules: the medical disorder identification module, the relevant context generation module, the context filtration module for distilling relevant medical concepts and knowledge, and finally, a general-purpose LLM to generate visually aware medical question summaries. Leveraging our MMQS dataset, we showcase how visual cues from images enhance the generation of medically nuanced summaries. This multimodal approach not only enhances the decision-making process in healthcare but also fosters a more nuanced understanding of patient queries, laying the groundwork for future research in personalized and responsive medical care. Disclaimer: The article features graphic medical imagery, a result of the subject's inherent requirements.
Akash Ghosh, Arkadeep Acharya, Raghav Jain, Sriparna Saha 0001, Aman Chadha, Setu Sinha
AAAI2
2024 MedSumm: A Multimodal Approach to Summarizing Code-Mixed Hindi-English Clinical Queries
Akash Ghosh, Arkadeep Acharya, Prince Jha, Sriparna Saha 0001, Aniket Gaudgaul, Rajdeep Majumdar, Aman Chadha, Raghav Jain, Setu Sinha, Shivani Agarwal 0005
ECIR (5)2
2023 Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language Models
abstract
Temporal reasoning represents a vital component of human communication and understanding, yet remains an underexplored area within the context of Large Language Models (LLMs).Despite LLMs demonstrating significant proficiency in a range of tasks, a comprehensive, large-scale analysis of their temporal reasoning capabilities is missing.Our paper addresses this gap, presenting the first extensive benchmarking of LLMs on temporal reasoning tasks.We critically evaluate 8 different LLMs across 6 datasets using 3 distinct prompting strategies.Additionally, we broaden the scope of our evaluation by including in our analysis 2 Code Generation LMs.Beyond broad benchmarking of models and prompts, we also conduct a finegrained investigation of performance across different categories of temporal tasks.We further analyze the LLMs on varying temporal aspects, offering insights into their proficiency in understanding and predicting the continuity, sequence, and progression of events over time.Our findings reveal a nuanced depiction of the capabilities and limitations of the models within temporal reasoning, offering a comprehensive reference for future research in this pivotal domain.
Raghav Jain, Daivik Sojitra, Arkadeep Acharya, Sriparna Saha 0001, Adam Jatowt, Sandipan Dandapat
EMNLP3
2023 LLM Based Generation of Item-Description for Recommendation System
abstract
The description of an item plays a pivotal role in providing concise and informative summaries to captivate potential viewers and is essential for recommendation systems. Traditionally, such descriptions were obtained through manual web scraping techniques, which are time-consuming and susceptible to data inconsistencies. In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-3.5, and open source LLMs like Alpaca have emerged as powerful tools for natural language processing tasks. In this paper, we have explored how we can use LLMs to generate detailed descriptions of the items. To conduct the study, we have used the MovieLens 1M dataset comprising movie titles and the Goodreads Dataset consisting of names of books and subsequently, an open-sourced LLM, Alpaca, was prompted with few-shot prompting on this dataset to generate detailed movie descriptions considering multiple features like the names of the cast and directors for the ML dataset and the names of the author and publisher for the Goodreads dataset. The generated description was then compared with the scraped descriptions using a combination of Top Hits, MRR, and NDCG as evaluation metrics. The results demonstrated that LLM-based movie description generation exhibits significant promise, with results comparable to the ones obtained by web-scraped descriptions.
Arkadeep Acharya, Brijraj Singh, Naoyuki Onoe
RecSys1