Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luise Puhlmann

dblp:357/3088 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-0776-4586ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 75% Approximation and online algorithms · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic combinatorial optimization
adaptivity gap
1.012026
Approximating Asymmetric A Priori TSP beyond the Adaptivity Gap · SODA 2026
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
1.012026
Approximating Asymmetric A Priori TSP beyond the Adaptivity Gap · SODA 2026
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › vehicle routing › traveling salesman problem
asymmetric TSP
1.012026
Approximating Asymmetric A Priori TSP beyond the Adaptivity Gap · SODA 2026
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
1.012026
Approximating Asymmetric A Priori TSP beyond the Adaptivity Gap · SODA 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

approximation algorithm · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Approximating Asymmetric A Priori TSP beyond the Adaptivity Gap
abstract
In Asymmetric A Priori TSP (with independent activation probabilities) we are given an instance of the Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem together with an activation probability for each vertex. The task is to compute a tour that minimizes the expected length after short-cutting to the randomly sampled set of active vertices.
Manuel Christalla, Luise Puhlmann, Vera Traub
SODA2
2023 Improved Guarantees for the a Priori TSP
abstract
We revisit the a priori TSP (with independent activation) and prove stronger approximation guarantees than were previously known. In the a priori TSP, we are given a metric space $(V,c)$ and an activation probability $p(v)$ for each customer $v\in V$. We ask for a TSP tour $T$ for $V$ that minimizes the expected length after cutting $T$ short by skipping the inactive customers. All known approximation algorithms select a nonempty subset $S$ of the customers and construct a master route solution, consisting of a TSP tour for $S$ and two edges connecting every customer $v\in V\setminus S$ to a nearest customer in $S$. We address the following questions. If we randomly sample the subset $S$, what should be the sampling probabilities? How much worse than the optimum can the best master route solution be? The answers to these questions (we provide almost matching lower and upper bounds) lead to improved approximation guarantees: less than 3.1 with randomized sampling, and less than 5.9 with a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm.
Jannis Blauth, Meike Neuwohner, Luise Puhlmann, Jens Vygen
ISAAC3