Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shang Qu

dblp:357/3500 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 62% Reinforcement learning · 38%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › online decision making › online reinforcement learning
test-time reinforcement learning
0.912025
TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025
Medical and health informatics › machine learning for healthcare
medical benchmark
0.912025
MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding · ICML 2025
Medical and health informatics › clinical decision-making
medical reasoning
0.912025
MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.312025
MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
reasoning evaluation
0.312025
MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

expert review · 1.7data synthesis · 1.7test-time scaling · 0.9majority voting · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding
abstract
We introduce MedXpertQA, a highly challenging and comprehensive benchmark to evaluate expert-level medical knowledge and advanced reasoning. MedXpertQA includes 4,460 questions spanning 17 specialties and 11 body systems. It includes two subsets, Text for text evaluation and MM for multimodal evaluation. Notably, MM introduces expert-level exam questions with diverse images and rich clinical information, including patient records and examination results, setting it apart from traditional medical multimodal benchmarks with simple QA pairs generated from image captions. MedXpertQA applies rigorous filtering and augmentation to address the insufficient difficulty of existing benchmarks like MedQA, and incorporates specialty board questions to improve clinical relevance and comprehensiveness. We perform data synthesis to mitigate data leakage risk and conduct multiple rounds of expert reviews to ensure accuracy and reliability. We evaluate 18 leading models on MedXpertQA. Moreover, medicine is deeply connected to real-world decision-making, providing a rich and representative setting for assessing reasoning abilities beyond mathematics and code. To this end, we develop a reasoning-oriented subset to facilitate the assessment of o1-like models.
Yuxin Zuo, Shang Qu, Zhang-Ren Chen, Xuekai Zhu, Ermo Hua, Ning Ding 0002, Bowen Zhou 0002
ICML2
2025 TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
abstract
This paper investigates Reinforcement Learning (RL) on data without explicit labels for reasoning tasks in Large Language Models (LLMs). The core challenge of the problem is reward estimation during inference while not having access to ground-truth information. While this setting appears elusive, we find that common practices in Test-Time Scaling (TTS), such as majority voting, yield surprisingly effective rewards suitable for driving RL training. In this work, we introduce Test-Time Reinforcement Learning (TTRL), a novel method for training LLMs using RL on unlabeled data. TTRL enables self-evolution of LLMs by utilizing the priors in the pre-trained models. Our experiments demonstrate that TTRL consistently improves performance across a variety of tasks and models. Notably, TTRL boosts the pass@1 performance of Qwen-2.5-Math-7B by approximately 211% on the AIME 2024 with only unlabeled test data. Furthermore, although TTRL is only supervised by the Maj@N metric, TTRL has demonstrated performance to consistently surpass the upper limit of the initial model, and approach the performance of models trained directly on test data with ground-truth labels. Our experimental findings validate the general effectiveness of TTRL across various tasks and highlight TTRL's potential for broader tasks and domains.
Yuxin Zuo, Shang Qu, Ganqu Cui, Xuekai Zhu, Haozhan Li, Xinwei Long, Ermo Hua, Biqing Qi, Youbang Sun, Zhiyuan Ma 0005, Lifan Yuan, Ning Ding 0002, Bowen Zhou 0002
NeurIPS4
2024 Reformulating Sequential Recommendation: Learning Dynamic User Interest with Content-enriched Language Modeling
Junzhe Jiang 0001, Shang Qu, Mingyue Cheng 0004, Qi Liu 0003, Zhiding Liu, Hao Zhang 0088, Rujiao Zhang, Kai Zhang 0038, Rui Li 0093, Jiatong Li 0002, Min Gao 0017
DASFAA (3)2
2024 Curriculum-Driven Edubot: A Framework for Developing Language Learning Chatbots through Synthesizing Conversational Data
abstract
Chatbots have become popular in educational settings, revolutionizing how students interact with material and how teachers teach.We present Curriculum-Driven EduBot, a framework for developing a chatbot that combines the interactive features of chatbots with the systematic material of English textbooks to assist students in enhancing their conversational skills.We begin by extracting pertinent topics from textbooks and using large language models to generate dialogues related to these topics.We then fine-tune an open-source model using our generated conversational data to create our curriculum-driven chatbot.User studies demonstrate that EduBot outperforms ChatGPT in leading curriculum-based dialogues and adapting its dialogue to match the user's English proficiency level.By combining traditional textbook methodologies with conversational AI, our approach offers learners an interactive tool that aligns with their curriculum and provides user-tailored conversation practice.This facilitates meaningful student-bot dialogues and enriches the overall learning experience within the curriculum's pedagogical framework.
Yu Li 0013, Shang Qu, Jili Shen, Shangchao Min, Zhou Yu 0005
SIGDIAL2