Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gokul Prabhakaran

dblp:357/5709 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 87% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
bipedal robot
0.812024
Fall Prediction for Bipedal Robots: The Standing Phase · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
fall prediction
0.812024
Fall Prediction for Bipedal Robots: The Standing Phase · ICRA 2024
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault detection
0.812024
Fall Prediction for Bipedal Robots: The Standing Phase · ICRA 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and calibration
0.212024
Fall Prediction for Bipedal Robots: The Standing Phase · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation and hardware data · 1.51d convolutional neural network · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Fall Prediction for Bipedal Robots: The Standing Phase
abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to fall prediction for bipedal robots, specifically targeting the detection of potential falls while standing caused by abrupt, incipient, and intermittent faults. Leveraging a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN), our method aims to maximize lead time for fall prediction while minimizing false positive rates. The proposed algorithm uniquely integrates the detection of various fault types and estimates the lead time for potential falls. Our contributions include the development of an algorithm capable of detecting abrupt, incipient, and intermittent faults in full-sized robots, its implementation using both simulation and hardware data for a humanoid robot, and a method for estimating lead time. Evaluation metrics, including false positive rate, lead time, and response time, demonstrate the efficacy of our approach. Particularly, our model achieves impressive lead times and response times across different fault scenarios with a false positive rate of 0. The findings of this study hold significant implications for enhancing the safety and reliability of bipedal robotic systems.
Margaret Eva Mungai, Gokul Prabhakaran, Jessy W. Grizzle
ICRA2