Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher Heron

dblp:358/3306 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8245-2953ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 67% Health and well-being technologies · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction
conversational agents
0.712023
Beyond Self-diagnosis: How a Chatbot-based Symptom Checker Should Respond · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2023
Human-AI interaction › conversational agents
health chatbot
0.712023
Beyond Self-diagnosis: How a Chatbot-based Symptom Checker Should Respond · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative interviews · 1.3human-centered design · 1.3experimental study · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Beyond Self-diagnosis: How a Chatbot-based Symptom Checker Should Respond
abstract
Chatbot-based symptom checker (CSC) apps have become increasingly popular in healthcare. These apps engage users in human-like conversations and offer possible medical diagnoses. The conversational design of these apps can significantly impact user perceptions and experiences, and may influence medical decisions users make and the medical care they receive. However, the effects of the conversational design of CSCs remain understudied, and there is a need to investigate and enhance users’ interactions with CSCs. In this article, we conducted a two-stage exploratory study using a human-centered design methodology. We first conducted a qualitative interview study to identify key user needs in engaging with CSCs. We then performed an experimental study to investigate potential CSC conversational design solutions based on the results from the interview study. We identified that emotional support, explanations of medical information, and efficiency were important factors for users in their interactions with CSCs. We also demonstrated that emotional support and explanations could affect user perceptions and experiences, and they are context-dependent. Based on these findings, we offer design implications for CSC conversations to improve the user experience and health-related decision-making.
Yue You, Chun-Hua Tsai, Yao Li 0006, Fenglong Ma, Christopher Heron, Xinning Gui
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.5