Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christopher Heron
dblp:358/3306
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8245-2953ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 67% Health and well-being technologies · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
conversational agents |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Self-diagnosis: How a Chatbot-based Symptom Checker Should Respond · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2023 |
Human-AI interaction › conversational agents
health chatbot |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Self-diagnosis: How a Chatbot-based Symptom Checker Should Respond · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative interviews · 1.3human-centered design · 1.3experimental study · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Beyond Self-diagnosis: How a Chatbot-based Symptom Checker Should RespondabstractChatbot-based symptom checker (CSC) apps have become increasingly popular in healthcare. These apps engage users in human-like conversations and offer possible medical diagnoses. The conversational design of these apps can significantly impact user perceptions and experiences, and may influence medical decisions users make and the medical care they receive. However, the effects of the conversational design of CSCs remain understudied, and there is a need to investigate and enhance users’ interactions with CSCs. In this article, we conducted a two-stage exploratory study using a human-centered design methodology. We first conducted a qualitative interview study to identify key user needs in engaging with CSCs. We then performed an experimental study to investigate potential CSC conversational design solutions based on the results from the interview study. We identified that emotional support, explanations of medical information, and efficiency were important factors for users in their interactions with CSCs. We also demonstrated that emotional support and explanations could affect user perceptions and experiences, and they are context-dependent. Based on these findings, we offer design implications for CSC conversations to improve the user experience and health-related decision-making. Yue You, Chun-Hua Tsai, Yao Li 0006, Fenglong Ma, Christopher Heron, Xinning Gui |
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. | 5 |