Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexandre Kirchmeyer

dblp:358/4111 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 45% Deep learning architectures and training · 42% Machine translation · 7%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
masked language modeling
0.812024
Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
non-autoregressive generation
0.812024
Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines · ICML 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
parallel decoding
0.812024
Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
convolutional neural network architecture
0.712023
Convolutional Networks with Oriented 1D Kernels · ICCV 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.212024
Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines · ICML 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.212023
Convolutional Networks with Oriented 1D Kernels · ICCV 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

depthwise convolution · 1.3CUDA · 1.3t5 · 0.8masking · 0.8markov chain · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines
abstract
Autoregressive language models are the currently dominant paradigm for text generation, however they have some fundamental limitations that cannot be remedied by scale—for example inherently sequential and unidirectional generation. While alternate classes of models have been explored, we have limited mathematical understanding of their fundamental power and limitations. In this paper we focus on Generative Masked Language Models (GMLMs), a non-autoregressive paradigm in which we train a model to fit conditional probabilities of the data distribution via masking, which are subsequently used as inputs to a Markov Chain to draw samples from the model. These models empirically strike a promising speed-quality trade-off as each step can be typically parallelized by decoding the entire sequence in parallel. We develop a mathematical framework for analyzing and improving such models which sheds light on questions of sample complexity and inference speed and quality. Empirically, we adapt the T5 model for iteratively-refined parallel decoding, achieving 2-3x speedup in machine translation with minimal sacrifice in quality compared with autoregressive models. We run careful ablation experiments to give recommendations on key design choices, and make fine-grained observations on the common error modes in connection with our theory. Our mathematical analyses and empirical observations characterize both potentials and limitations of this approach, and can be applied to future works on improving understanding and performance of GMLMs. We released codes for our experiments.
Alexandre Kirchmeyer, Aashay Mehta, Yilong Qin, Boris Dadachev, Kishore Papineni, Sanjiv Kumar, Andrej Risteski
ICML2
2023 Convolutional Networks with Oriented 1D Kernels
abstract
In computer vision, 2D convolution is arguably the most important operation performed by a ConvNet. Unsurprisingly, it has been the focus of intense software and hardware optimization and enjoys highly efficient implementations. In this work, we ask an intriguing question: can we make a ConvNet work without 2D convolutions? Surprisingly, we find that the answer is yes—we show that a ConvNet consisting entirely of 1D convolutions can do just as well as 2D on ImageNet classification. Specifically, we find that one key ingredient to a high-performing 1D ConvNet is oriented 1D kernels: 1D kernels that are oriented not just horizontally or vertically, but also at other angles. Our experiments show that oriented 1D convolutions can not only replace 2D convolutions but also augment existing architectures with large kernels, leading to improved accuracy with minimal FLOPs increase. A key contribution of this work is a highly-optimized custom CUDA implementation of oriented 1D kernels, specialized to the depthwise convolution setting. Our benchmarks demonstrate that our custom CUDA implementation almost perfectly realizes the theoretical advantage of 1D convolution: it is faster than a native horizontal convolution for any arbitrary angle. Code is available at https://github.com/princeton-vl/Oriented1D.
Alexandre Kirchmeyer, Jia Deng 0001
ICCV1