Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Seonglae Cho

dblp:359/3604 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
agentic AI
1.012026
AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness evaluation
1.012026
AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.312026
AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trace-grounded failure detection · 2.0interactive knowledge graph · 2.0causal attribution · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems
abstract
Modern Agentic AI systems plan, reason, and act across multiple steps, creating execution patterns that are difficult to interpret. Existing observability platforms track prompt I/O and operational metrics but require manual inspection of traces to reconstruct structure and reasoning. We present AgentGraph, which converts execution logs into interactive knowledge graphs and actionable insights. Nodes represent agents, tasks, tools, data inputs/outputs, and humans, while typed edges capture relations such as inputs consumed, tasks delegated or sequenced, tools required or used, outputs produced and delivered, and interventions from agents or humans. Each graph element links to its exact trace span, ensuring verifiability. Building on this representation, AgentGraph enables two analyses: qualitative trace-grounded failure detection and optimisation recommendations, and quantitative robustness evaluation via perturbation testing and causal attribution.
Zekun Wu 0003, Seonglae Cho, Cristian E. Muñoz Villalobos, Theo King, Umar Mohammed, Emre Kazim, María Pérez-Ortiz 0001, Sahan Bulathwela, Adriano S. Koshiyama
AAAI2