Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qisheng Hu
dblp:359/6493
· DBLP profile ↗
in reviewer pool
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 65% Information extraction and text analysis · 24% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 11% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › temporal summarization
timeline summarization |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Just What You Desire: Constrained Timeline Summarization with Self-Reflection for Enhanced Relevance · AAAI 2025 From Moments to Milestones: Incremental Timeline Summarization Leveraging Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Coordinating Search-Informed Reasoning and Reasoning-Guided Search in Claim Verification · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
demonstration selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | STARE at the Structure: Steering ICL Exemplar Selection with Structural Alignment · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | STARE at the Structure: Steering ICL Exemplar Selection with Structural Alignment · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | STARE at the Structure: Steering ICL Exemplar Selection with Structural Alignment · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | STARE at the Structure: Steering ICL Exemplar Selection with Structural Alignment · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › neural summarization
LLM-based summarization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | From Moments to Milestones: Incremental Timeline Summarization Leveraging Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.0hierarchical agent reasoning · 1.0structure-aware fine-tuning · 0.9self-reflection · 0.9large language model · 0.9clustering · 0.9BERT-based retriever · 0.9pseudo-oracle event clustering · 0.8incremental clustering · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Coordinating Search-Informed Reasoning and Reasoning-Guided Search in Claim VerificationabstractMulti-hop claim verification is inherently challenging, requiring multi-step reasoning to construct verification chains while iteratively searching for information to uncover hidden bridging facts. This process is fundamentally interleaved, as effective reasoning relies on dynamically retrieved evidence, while effective search demands reasoning to refine queries based on partial information. To achieve this, we propose Hierarchical Agent Reasoning and Information Search (HARIS), explicitly modeling the coordinated process of reasoning-driven searching and search-informed reasoning. HARIS consists of a high-level reasoning agent that focuses on constructing the main verification chain, generating factual questions when more information is needed, and a low-level search agent that iteratively retrieves more information, refining its search based on intermediate findings. This design allows each agent to specialize in its respective task, enhancing verification accuracy and interpretability. HARIS is trained using reinforcement learning with outcome-based rewards. Experimental results on the EX-FEVER and HOVER benchmarks demonstrate that HARIS achieves strong performance, greatly advancing multi-hop claim verification. Qisheng Hu, Quanyu Long, Wenya Wang 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Just What You Desire: Constrained Timeline Summarization with Self-Reflection for Enhanced RelevanceabstractGiven news articles about an entity, such as a public figure or organization, timeline summarization (TLS) involves generating a timeline that summarizes the key events about the entity. However, the TLS task is too underspecified, since what is of interest to each reader may vary, and hence there is not a single ideal or optimal timeline. In this paper, we introduce a novel task, called Constrained Timeline Summarization (CTLS), where a timeline is generated in which all events in the timeline meet some constraint. An example of a constrained timeline concerns the legal battles of Tiger Woods, where only events related to his legal problems are selected to appear in the timeline. We collected a new human-verified dataset of constrained timelines involving 47 entities and 5 constraints per entity. We propose an approach that employs a large language model (LLM) to summarize news articles according to a specified constraint and cluster them to identify key events to include in a constrained timeline. In addition, we propose a novel self-reflection method during summary generation, demonstrating that this approach successfully leads to improved performance. Muhammad Reza Qorib, Qisheng Hu, Hwee Tou Ng |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | STARE at the Structure: Steering ICL Exemplar Selection with Structural AlignmentabstractIn-Context Learning (ICL) has become a powerful paradigm that enables LLMs to perform a wide range of tasks without task-specific finetuning.However, the effectiveness of ICL heavily depends on the quality of exemplar selection.In particular, for structured prediction tasks such as semantic parsing, existing ICL selection strategies often overlook structural alignment, leading to suboptimal performance and poor generalization.To address this issue, we propose a novel two-stage exemplar selection strategy that achieves a strong balance between efficiency, generalizability, and performance.First, we fine-tune a BERT-based retriever using structure-aware supervision, guiding it to select exemplars that are both semantically relevant and structurally aligned.Then, we enhance the retriever with a plug-in module, which amplifies syntactically meaningful information in the hidden representations.This plug-in is model-agnostic, requires minimal overhead, and can be seamlessly integrated into existing pipelines.Experiments on four benchmarks spanning three semantic parsing tasks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing baselines with multiple recent LLMs as inference-time models 1 . Qisheng Hu, Jing Li 0049, Wenya Wang 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2025 | Decomposition Dilemmas: Does Claim Decomposition Boost or Burden Fact-Checking Performance?abstractQisheng Hu, Quanyu Long, Wenya Wang. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Qisheng Hu, Quanyu Long, Wenya Wang 0001 |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 1 |
| 2024 | From Moments to Milestones: Incremental Timeline Summarization Leveraging Large Language ModelsabstractTimeline summarization (TLS) is essential for distilling coherent narratives from a vast collection of texts, tracing the progression of events and topics over time.Prior research typically focuses on either event or topic timeline summarization, neglecting the potential synergy of these two forms.In this study, we bridge this gap by introducing a novel approach that leverages large language models (LLMs) for generating both event and topic timelines.Our approach diverges from conventional TLS by prioritizing event detection, leveraging LLMs as pseudo-oracles for incremental event clustering and construction of timelines from a text stream.As a result, it produces a more interpretable pipeline.Empirical evaluation across four TLS benchmarks reveals that our approach outperforms the best prior published approaches, highlighting the potential of LLMs in timeline summarization for real-world applications.1 Qisheng Hu, Geonsik Moon, Hwee Tou Ng |
ACL (1) | 1 |