Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert M. Prouty
dblp:36/1195
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 68% Electronic design automation · 16% Distributed systems · 16% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Adaptive load migration systems for PVM · SC 1994 |
Distributed systems
distributed resource management |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Adaptive load migration systems for PVM · SC 1994 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and runtimes |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Adaptive load migration systems for PVM · SC 1994 |
Electronic design automation › yield analysis
process variation modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Adaptive load migration systems for PVM · SC 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user-level virtual processors · 0.0process migration · 0.0adaptive data movement · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Adaptive load migration systems for PVMabstractAdaptive load distribution is necessary for parallel applications to co-exist effectively with other jobs in a network of shared, heterogeneous workstations. We present three methods that provide such support for PVM applications. Two of these methods, MPVM (migratable PVM) and UPVM (user-level PVM), adapt to changes in the workstation environment by transparently migrating the virtual processors (VPs) of the parallel application. A VP in MPVM is a Unix process, while UPVM defines lightweight process-like VPs. The third method, ADM (adaptive data movement), is a programming methodology for writing programs that perform adaptive load distribution through data movement. These methods are discussed and compared in terms of effectiveness, usability and performance.> Jeremy Casas, Ravi B. Konuru, Steve W. Otto, Robert M. Prouty, Jonathan Walpole |
SC | 4 |