Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert M. Prouty

dblp:36/1195 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 68% Electronic design automation · 16% Distributed systems · 16%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing
0.011994
Adaptive load migration systems for PVM · SC 1994
Distributed systems
distributed resource management
0.011994
Adaptive load migration systems for PVM · SC 1994
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and runtimes
0.011994
Adaptive load migration systems for PVM · SC 1994
Electronic design automation › yield analysis
process variation modeling
0.011994
Adaptive load migration systems for PVM · SC 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user-level virtual processors · 0.0process migration · 0.0adaptive data movement · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Adaptive load migration systems for PVM
abstract
Adaptive load distribution is necessary for parallel applications to co-exist effectively with other jobs in a network of shared, heterogeneous workstations. We present three methods that provide such support for PVM applications. Two of these methods, MPVM (migratable PVM) and UPVM (user-level PVM), adapt to changes in the workstation environment by transparently migrating the virtual processors (VPs) of the parallel application. A VP in MPVM is a Unix process, while UPVM defines lightweight process-like VPs. The third method, ADM (adaptive data movement), is a programming methodology for writing programs that perform adaptive load distribution through data movement. These methods are discussed and compared in terms of effectiveness, usability and performance.>
Jeremy Casas, Ravi B. Konuru, Steve W. Otto, Robert M. Prouty, Jonathan Walpole
SC4