Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Sæbjørnsen

dblp:36/4151 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
code clone detection
0.112009
Detecting code clones in binary executables · ISSTA 2009
Software maintenance and evolution
reverse engineering
0.012009
Detecting code clones in binary executables · ISSTA 2009
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Detecting code clones in binary executables
abstract
Large software projects contain significant code duplication, mainly due to copying and pasting code. Many techniques have been developed to identify duplicated code to enable applications such as refactoring, detecting bugs, and protecting intellectual property. Because source code is often unavailable, especially for third-party software, finding duplicated code in binaries becomes particularly important. However, existing techniques operate primarily on source code, and no effective tool exists for binaries.
Andreas Sæbjørnsen, Jeremiah Willcock, Thomas Panas, Daniel J. Quinlan, Zhendong Su 0001
ISSTA1
2007 Communicating Software Architecture using a Unified Single-View Visualization
abstract
Software is among the most complex human artifacts, and visualization is widely acknowledged as important to understanding software. In this paper, we consider the problem of understanding a software system's architecture through visualization. Whereas traditional visualizations use multiple stakeholder-specific views to present different kinds of task- specific information, we propose an additional visualization technique that unifies the presentation of various kinds of architecture-level information, thereby allowing a variety of stakeholders to quickly see and communicate current development, quality, and costs of a software system. For future empirical evaluation of multi-aspect, single-view architectural visualizations, we have implemented our idea in an existing visualization tool, Vizz3D. Our implementation includes techniques, such as the use of a city metaphor, that reduce visual complexity in order to support single-view visualizations of large-scale programs.
Thomas Panas, Thomas Epperly, Daniel J. Quinlan, Andreas Sæbjørnsen, Richard W. Vuduc
ICECCS4
2004 Classification and Utilization of Abstractions for Optimization
Daniel J. Quinlan, Markus Schordan, Qing Yi, Andreas Sæbjørnsen
ISoLA4