Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter Anderson-Sprecher

dblp:36/5959 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 42% Motion planning and robot control · 37% Video understanding and tracking · 21%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
reachability analysis
0.112012
Voxel-based motion bounding and workspace estimation for robotic manipulators · ICRA 2012
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
background subtraction
0.112011
Background subtraction and accessibility analysis in evidence grids · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › occupancy grid mapping
evidence grid
0.112011
Background subtraction and accessibility analysis in evidence grids · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
occupancy grid mapping
0.112011
Background subtraction and accessibility analysis in evidence grids · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
workspace analysis
0.012012
Voxel-based motion bounding and workspace estimation for robotic manipulators · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › workspace analysis
accessibility analysis
0.012011
Background subtraction and accessibility analysis in evidence grids · ICRA 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

voxel approximation · 0.1joint motion constraints · 0.1sensor fusion · 0.1accessibility analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Voxel-based motion bounding and workspace estimation for robotic manipulators
abstract
Identification of regions in space that a robotic manipulator can reach in a given amount of time is important for many applications, such as safety monitoring of industrial manipulators and trajectory and task planning. However, due to the high-dimensional configuration space of many robots, reasoning about possible physical motion is often intractable. In this paper, we propose a novel method for creating a reachability grid, a voxel-based representation that estimates the minimum time needed for a manipulator to reach any physical location within its workspace. We use up to second-degree constraints on joint motion to model motion limits for each joint independently, followed by successive voxel approximations to map these limits on to the robot's physical workspace. Results using a simulated manipulator indicate that our method can produce accurate reachability grids in real-time, even for robots with many degrees of freedom. Furthermore, errors are almost exclusively biased towards producing more optimistic reachability estimates, which is a desirable characteristic for many applications.
Peter Anderson-Sprecher, Reid G. Simmons
ICRA1
2012 Sensor fusion for human safety in industrial workcells
abstract
Current manufacturing practices require complete physical separation between people and active industrial robots. These precautions ensure safety, but are inefficient in terms of time and resources, and place limits on the types of tasks that can be performed. In this paper, we present a real-time, sensor-based approach for ensuring the safety of people in close proximity to robots in an industrial workcell. Our approach fuses data from multiple 3D imaging sensors of different modalities into a volumetric evidence grid and segments the volume into regions corresponding to background, robots, and people. Surrounding each robot is a danger zone that dynamically updates according to the robot's position and trajectory. Similarly, surrounding each person is a dynamically updated safety zone. A collision between danger and safety zones indicates an impending actual collision, and the affected robot is stopped until the problem is resolved. We demonstrate and experimentally evaluate the concept in a prototype industrial workcell augmented with stereo and range cameras.
Paul E. Rybski, Peter Anderson-Sprecher, Daniel Huber, Chris Niessl, Reid G. Simmons
IROS2
2011 Background subtraction and accessibility analysis in evidence grids
abstract
Evidence grids are a popular representation for fused data from multiple sensors. Previous attempts at back ground subtraction within evidence grids either do so prior to sensor fusion or do so naively, simply ignoring any cells with a high background occupancy probability. A key weakness of these approaches is that they cannot reason about interiors of objects or other unobserved regions. Recognizing and removing solid object interiors is important for any application that must be able to differentiate between occupied and unknown space after background subtraction. In this paper, we propose accessibility analysis as a method for the removal of interior regions. We then present and compare two approaches for performing background subtraction with accessibility analysis in evidence grids. Performance is measured using a 3D evidence grid in a test bed for a sensing system designed for use in safety monitoring of an automated assembly workcell. Within the parameters of the present study, both techniques allow for precise detection of foreground objects while fully removing background objects. Subtraction runs in near real-time, even for large grids.
Peter Anderson-Sprecher, Reid G. Simmons, Daniel Huber
ICRA1