Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert Muszynski
dblp:36/6026
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 74% Robot manipulation · 26% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
inverse kinematics |
0.0 | 3 | 2000 | Singular inverse kinematic problem for robotic manipulators: a normal form approach · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1998 A Normal form Solution to the Singular Inverse Kinematic Problem for Robotic Manipulators: The Quadratic Case · ICRA 1998 Instantaneous Kinematics and Dexterity of Mobile Manipulators · ICRA 2000 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
dexterity analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Instantaneous Kinematics and Dexterity of Mobile Manipulators · ICRA 2000 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dexterity measure |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Instantaneous Kinematics and Dexterity of Mobile Manipulators · ICRA 2000 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
instantaneous kinematics |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Instantaneous Kinematics and Dexterity of Mobile Manipulators · ICRA 2000 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Instantaneous Kinematics and Dexterity of Mobile Manipulators · ICRA 2000 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
normal form |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Singular inverse kinematic problem for robotic manipulators: a normal form approach · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1998 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot kinematics |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Singular inverse kinematic problem for robotic manipulators: a normal form approach · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1998 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
redundancy resolution |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | A Normal form Solution to the Singular Inverse Kinematic Problem for Robotic Manipulators: The Quadratic Case · ICRA 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
singularity-robust inverse · 0.0hilbert space control · 0.0analytic jacobian · 0.0normal form theory · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Instantaneous Kinematics and Dexterity of Mobile ManipulatorsabstractWe consider the kinematics of a mobile manipulator that consists of a nonholonomic (or holonomic) mobile platform and a holonomic manipulator mounted atop of the platform. At any fixed time instant and with fixed initial posture of the platform these kinematics are viewed as a map from a Hilbert space of controls and manipulator joint positions into a task-space of the mobile manipulator, and called the instantaneous kinematics. A derivative of this map is referred to as the instantaneous analytic Jacobian of the mobile manipulator. We derive an instantaneous dexterity matrix and a dexterity measure of the mobile manipulator. The dexterity matrix is used in order to introduce an instantaneous dexterity ellipsoid of the mobile manipulator. Concepts are illustrated with examples of mobile manipulators equipped with both holonomic and nonholonomic mobile platforms. Krzysztof Tchon, Robert Muszynski |
ICRA | 2 |
| 1998 | A Normal form Solution to the Singular Inverse Kinematic Problem for Robotic Manipulators: The Quadratic CaseabstractWe present a normal form approach to solving the singular inverse kinematic problem for non-redundant robot kinematics. A standing assumption is made that singular configurations of the kinematics have corank 1 and that the kinematics are equivalent to the quadratic normal form. The approach has been illustrated with a simulation case study of 2R kinematics. A comparison with the singularity-robust inverse technique and the null-space based approach has demonstrated advantages of the normal form approach. Krzysztof Tchon, Robert Muszynski |
ICRA | 2 |
| 1998 | Singular inverse kinematic problem for robotic manipulators: a normal form approachabstractIn this article, a new method of solving the singular inverse kinematic problem for nonredundant robotic manipulators is proposed, based on normal forms of the manipulator kinematics. A complete solution to the inverse problem is presented under assumption that the kinematics are equivalent to the quadratic normal form. Comparisons with other existing methods, including the singularity-robust inverse, are made that reveal advantages of the normal form approach. Experimental results concerned with singular tracking in the AdeptOne manipulator are reported. Krzysztof Tchon, Robert Muszynski |
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. | 2 |
| 1997 | On Use of ANNs to Model and to Control Robot Manipulators
Ignacy Duleba, Robert Muszynski |
ICANN | 2 |
| 1996 | Neural network-based modeling of robot action effects in conceptual state space of real worldabstractThis paper gives the concept of an autonomous robotic agent that is capable of showing both machine learning and reactive behavior. The first methodology is used to collect information about the environment and to plan robot actions based on this information while the robot is performing tasks. Processing and storing information obtained during several task executions is called lifelong learning. Reactive behavior, the second desirable feature of an autonomous robot, is needed to execute the actions in a dynamically changing environment. This paper presents the main components of the machine learning part of the autonomous robotic agent: the conceptual state generalization module that forms conceptual states as categories (clusters) of observation vectors obtained from the sensor system; and the robot behavior effects modeller that calculates the next conceptual state from the current state and an action obtained from the action planner. Witold Jacak, Stephan Dreiseitl, Robert Muszynski |
IROS | 3 |