Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nora Rieber
dblp:36/7067
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
somatic copy number alteration detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reliability of algorithmic somatic copy number alteration detection from targeted capture data · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | RNAither, an automated pipeline for the statistical analysis of high-throughput RNAi screens · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
RNAi screen analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | RNAither, an automated pipeline for the statistical analysis of high-throughput RNAi screens · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Reliability of algorithmic somatic copy number alteration detection from targeted capture data · Bioinform. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.3SCNA calling algorithms · 0.3statistical testing · 0.1pathway enrichment analysis · 0.1data normalization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Reliability of algorithmic somatic copy number alteration detection from targeted capture dataabstractMOTIVATION: Whole exome and gene panel sequencing are increasingly used for oncological diagnostics. To investigate the accuracy of SCNA detection algorithms on simulated and clinical tumor samples, the precision and sensitivity of four SCNA callers were measured using 50 simulated whole exome and 50 simulated targeted gene panel datasets, and using 119 TCGA tumor samples for which SNP array data were available. RESULTS: On synthetic exome and panel data, VarScan2 mostly called false positives, whereas Control-FREEC was precise (>90% correct calls) at the cost of low sensitivity (<40% detected). ONCOCNV was slightly less precise on gene panel data, with similarly low sensitivity. This could be explained by low sensitivity for amplifications and high precision for deletions. Surprisingly, these results were not strongly affected by moderate tumor impurities; only contaminations with more than 60% non-cancerous cells resulted in strongly declining precision and sensitivity. On the 119 clinical samples, both Control-FREEC and CNVkit called 71.8% and 94%, respectively, of the SCNAs found by the SNP arrays, but with a considerable amount of false positives (precision 29% and 4.9%). DISCUSSION: Whole exome and targeted gene panel methods by design limit the precision of SCNA callers, making them prone to false positives. SCNA calls cannot easily be integrated in clinical pipelines that use data from targeted capture-based sequencing. If used at all, they need to be cross-validated using orthogonal methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Scripts are provided as supplementary information. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Nora Rieber, Regina Bohnert, Ulrike Ziehm, Gunther Jansen |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2009 | RNAither, an automated pipeline for the statistical analysis of high-throughput RNAi screensabstractSUMMARY: We present RNAither, a package for the free statistical environment R which performs an analysis of high-throughput RNA interference (RNAi) knock-down experiments, generating lists of relevant genes and pathways out of raw experimental data. The library provides a quality assessment of the signal intensities, as well as a broad range of options for data normalization, different statistical tests for the identification of significant siRNAs, and a significance analysis of the biological processes involving corresponding genes. The results of the analysis are presented as a set of HTML pages. Additionally, all values and plots are available as either text files or pdf and png files. AVAILABILITY: http://bioconductor.org/ Nora Rieber, Bettina Knapp, Roland Eils, Lars Kaderali |
Bioinform. | 1 |