Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xingjian Tao
dblp:360/5057
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-6969-477XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mitigating Structural Overfitting: A Distribution-Aware Rectification Framework for Missing Feature Imputation · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked autoencoder |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mitigating Structural Overfitting: A Distribution-Aware Rectification Framework for Missing Feature Imputation · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › missing data
missing data imputation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mitigating Structural Overfitting: A Distribution-Aware Rectification Framework for Missing Feature Imputation · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Energy-Calibrated VAE with Test Time Free Lunch · ECCV (85) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Mitigating Structural Overfitting: A Distribution-Aware Rectification Framework for Missing Feature Imputation · SIGIR 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
test-time distribution rectification · 1.0structural augmentation · 1.0masked autoencoding · 1.0test-time adaptation · 0.8energy-based calibration · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Mitigating Structural Overfitting: A Distribution-Aware Rectification Framework for Missing Feature ImputationabstractIncomplete node features are ubiquitous in real-world scenarios such as user profiling and cold-start recommendation, which severely hinders the practical deployment of graph learning systems (e.g., GNNs). Existing solutions typically rely on diffusion-based structural smoothing (e.g., feature propagation) to impute missing values. However, we find that these approaches suffer from structural overfitting, leading to three progressive challenges: 1) performance degradation on disjoint graphs, 2) loss of semantic diversity due to over-smoothing, and 3) feature distribution shift when generalizing to unseen graph structures (inductive tasks). To address these challenges, we introduce the DART framework. It begins by employing Global Structural Augmentation (GSA), which establishes global correlations to bridge disjoint components and extend diffusion coverage. Building upon this, we design a semantic rectifier based on masked autoencoding. This module learns the latent feature manifold to recover natural semantic details. Crucially, we introduce a test-time distribution rectification mechanism that projects structurally biased features back onto the learned manifold during inference, effectively bridging the inductive distribution gap. Furthermore, considering that synthetic masking fails to reflect realworld sparsity, we present a new dataset Sailing collected from voyage records with naturally missing attributes. Extensive experiments on six public datasets and Sailing demonstrate that DART significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both transductive and inductive settings. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/yfsong00/DART. Yifan Song 0006, Fenglin Yu, Yihong Luo, Xingjian Tao, Siya Qiu, Kai Han 0003, Jing Tang 0004 |
SIGIR | 4 |
| 2024 | Energy-Calibrated VAE with Test Time Free Lunch
Yihong Luo, Siya Qiu, Xingjian Tao, Yujun Cai, Jing Tang 0004 |
ECCV (85) | 3 |
| 2024 | AFSRAM-CIM: Adder Free SRAM-Based Digital Computation-in-Memory for BNNabstractBinary Neural Networks (BNNs) have demonstrated significant advantages in reducing computation and memory costs, all while maintaining acceptable accuracy on various image detection tasks. Thus, BNNs have the potential to support practical cognitive tasks on resource-constrained platforms, such as edge computing devices. To realize this, SRAM-based digital Computation-in-Memory (CIM) has gained growing attention as it overcomes the analog CIM architecture bottlenecks such as limited computing accuracy due to process variation, non-linearity, power and area-hungry Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs), etc. However, digital CIM architectures are highly dominated by power-hungry adder-trees, which can nullify the benefits of SRAM-based digital CIM. To address this issue, this paper proposes an adder free SRAM-based digital CIM, AFSRAM-CIM, for BNN acceleration. The proposed CIM architecture utilizes a multi-functional 10-T SRAM cell-based crossbar array and a new energy-efficient approach to perform the popcount operation. Simulation results using the MNIST dataset show that the proposed architecture maintains the state-of-the-art inference accuracy of 99.21% with only 11.86 fJ energy per operation. Moreover, AFSRAM-CIM achieves over$3\times$energy and$\approx 17\times$area savings when compared to the conventional digital CIM approaches. Asmae El Arrassi, Mohammad Amin Yaldagard, Xingjian Tao, Taha Shahroodi, Fouwad Jamil Mir, Yashvardhan Biyani, Manil Dev Gomony, Anteneh Gebregiorgis, Rajiv V. Joshi, Said Hamdioui |
VLSI-SoC | 3 |