Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Naixing Wu
dblp:361/7586
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 44% Distributed systems · 44% Performance modeling and evaluation · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
anomaly detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diner: Interpretable Anomaly Detection for Seasonal Time Series in Web Services · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2024 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter operations
datacenter monitoring |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diner: Interpretable Anomaly Detection for Seasonal Time Series in Web Services · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2024 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Diner: Interpretable Anomaly Detection for Seasonal Time Series in Web Services · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical baseline · 0.8deep learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Diner: Interpretable Anomaly Detection for Seasonal Time Series in Web ServicesabstractMonitoring and anomaly detection of key performance indicators (KPIs) are crucial for large Internet companies to maintain the reliability of their Web services. Influenced by human behavior and schedules, the KPIs of Web services typically exhibit seasonal characteristics. These characteristics may be complex as different KPIs exhibit differences in trend, multiple periods, and noise behaviors. However, existing anomaly detection methods typically only model one fixed pattern of seasonal KPIs, which may lead to performance degradation when dealing with diverse seasonal KPIs. In this work, we propose a novel anomaly detection model for seasonal KPIs,Diner, which incorporates multiple interpretable components. It is able to capture the additive and multiplicative trends, multiple periods, and seasonal noise in intricate seasonal KPIs, making it easily adaptable to different types of seasonal KPIs. Additionally, we present a set of evaluation criteria for generic time series anomaly detection tasks, which prove more effective in handling ambiguous manual labels and various anomaly events. Experiments are conducted on three real-world datasets, and the performanceDinersurpassed both the statistical baseline and the state-of-the-art deep learning baselines. Yuhan Jing, Jingyu Wang 0001, Ji Qi 0005, Qi Qi 0001, Bo He 0003, Zirui Zhuang, Naixing Wu, Jianxin Liao |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 7 |
| 2023 | Multi-modal Instance Refinement for Cross-Domain Action Recognition
Yuan Qing, Naixing Wu, Shaohua Wan 0001, Lixin Duan |
PRCV (1) | 2 |