Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fabian Rauscher

dblp:362/2615 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
6as first author
13since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-7286-1156ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 13 · 6 first-author · 13 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
7 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 90% Systems and software security · 8% Network security · 2%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Storage systems · 47% Memory systems · 14% Performance modeling and evaluation · 14%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack
2.432025
Secret Spilling Drive: Leaking User Behavior through SSD Contention · NDSS 2025
SnailLoad: Exploiting Remote Network Latency Measurements without JavaScript · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
IdleLeak: Exploiting Idle State Side Effects for Information Leakage · NDSS 2024
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
1.722025
TEEcorrelate: An Information-Preserving Defense against Performance-Counter Attacks on TEEs · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
TDXploit: Novel Techniques for Single-Stepping and Cache Attacks on Intel TDX · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks
cache attacks
0.912025
TDXploit: Novel Techniques for Single-Stepping and Cache Attacks on Intel TDX · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Hardware security and side channels
cache side channel
0.912025
A Systematic Evaluation of Novel and Existing Cache Side Channels · NDSS 2025
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
Intel TDX
0.912025
TDXploit: Novel Techniques for Single-Stepping and Cache Attacks on Intel TDX · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks
performance counter attacks
0.912025
TEEcorrelate: An Information-Preserving Defense against Performance-Counter Attacks on TEEs · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Hardware security and side channels › fault attacks
single-stepping attack
0.912025
TDXploit: Novel Techniques for Single-Stepping and Cache Attacks on Intel TDX · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Storage systems
flash and SSD
0.912025
Secret Spilling Drive: Leaking User Behavior through SSD Contention · NDSS 2025
Systems and software security › vulnerability analysis
attack surface analysis
0.812024
Cross-Core Interrupt Detection: Exploiting User and Virtualized IPIs · CCS 2024
Memory systems
cache
0.312025
A Systematic Evaluation of Novel and Existing Cache Side Channels · NDSS 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance monitoring
hardware performance counters
0.312025
TEEcorrelate: An Information-Preserving Defense against Performance-Counter Attacks on TEEs · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Network security
traffic analysis
0.212024
SnailLoad: Exploiting Remote Network Latency Measurements without JavaScript · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Operating systems › kernel
interrupt handling
0.212024
Cross-Core Interrupt Detection: Exploiting User and Virtualized IPIs · CCS 2024
Energy-efficient computing
power management
0.212024
IdleLeak: Exploiting Idle State Side Effects for Information Leakage · NDSS 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing
virtualization
0.212024
Cross-Core Interrupt Detection: Exploiting User and Virtualized IPIs · CCS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reverse engineering · 2.3information-preserving defense · 1.7evaluation · 1.7information leakage analysis · 1.5defense mechanisms · 0.9defense mechanism · 0.9cache side channel · 0.9latency measurement · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 TELESCOPE: TDX Exploit Leaking Encrypted Data using Sibling Core Performance Counters
abstract
Trusted execution environments (TEEs) protect applications running inside of them from untrusted host systems. The host can not access or modify the memory of applications protected by a TEE. Intel TDX is a recently introduced TEE that allows for the execution of arbitrary code, including entire operating systems, inside a protected environment. Prior work has attacked AMD SEV-SNP, AMD's counterpart to Intel TDX, using performance counters, by leaking sensitive information through them, e.g., which branches are taken. Intel TDX is thought not to be affected by such attacks, as it disables performance counters when entering the protected guests (TDs) to mitigate these attacks.
Fabian Rauscher, Hannes Weissteiner, Daniel Gruss
AsiaCCS1
2025 Systematic Analysis of Kernel Security Performance and Energy Costs
Fabian Rauscher, Benedict Herzog, Timo Hönig, Daniel Gruss
AsiaCCS1
2025 Verifying DRAM Addressing in Software
Martin Heckel, Florian Adamsky, Jonas Juffinger, Fabian Rauscher, Daniel Gruss
ESORICS (3)4
2025 WaitWatcher and WaitGuard: Detecting Flush-Based Cache Side-Channels Through Spurious Wakeups
Lukas Lamster, Fabian Rauscher, Martin Unterguggenberger, Stefan Mangard
ESORICS (3)2
2025 Secret Spilling Drive: Leaking User Behavior through SSD Contention
Jonas Juffinger, Fabian Rauscher, Giuseppe La Manna, Daniel Gruss
NDSS2
2025 A Systematic Evaluation of Novel and Existing Cache Side Channels
Fabian Rauscher, Carina Fiedler, Andreas Kogler, Daniel Gruss
NDSS1
2025 TDXploit: Novel Techniques for Single-Stepping and Cache Attacks on Intel TDX
Fabian Rauscher, Luca Wilke, Hannes Weissteiner, Thomas Eisenbarth 0001, Daniel Gruss
USENIX Security Symposium1
2025 TEEcorrelate: An Information-Preserving Defense against Performance-Counter Attacks on TEEs
Hannes Weissteiner, Fabian Rauscher, Robin Leander Schröder, Jonas Juffinger, Stefan Gast, Jan Wichelmann, Thomas Eisenbarth 0001, Daniel Gruss
USENIX Security Symposium2
2024 Generic and Automated Drive-by GPU Cache Attacks from the Browser
abstract
In recent years, the use of GPUs for general-purpose computations has steadily increased. As security-critical computations like AES are becoming more common on GPUs, the scrutiny must also increase. At the same time, new technologies like WebGPU put easy access to compute shaders in every web browser. Prior work has shown that GPU caches are vulnerable to the same eviction-based attacks as CPUs, e.g., Prime+Probe, from native code.
Lukas Giner, Roland Czerny, Christoph Gruber, Fabian Rauscher, Andreas Kogler, Daniel De Almeida Braga, Daniel Gruss
AsiaCCS4
2024 Cross-Core Interrupt Detection: Exploiting User and Virtualized IPIs
abstract
Interrupts are fundamental for inter-process and cross-core communication in modern systems. Controlling these communication mechanisms historically requires switches into the kernel or hypervisor, incurring high-performance costs. To alleviate these costs, Intel introduced new hardware mechanisms to send inter-processor interrupts (IPIs) from user space without switching into the kernel and from virtual machines without switching into the hypervisor. However, it is unclear whether this direct, unsupervised interaction between unprivileged (or virtualized) workloads and the underlying hardware introduces a significant change in the attack surface.
Fabian Rauscher, Daniel Gruss
CCS1
2024 IdleLeak: Exploiting Idle State Side Effects for Information Leakage
Fabian Rauscher, Andreas Kogler, Jonas Juffinger, Daniel Gruss
NDSS1
2024 SnailLoad: Exploiting Remote Network Latency Measurements without JavaScript
Stefan Gast, Roland Czerny, Jonas Juffinger, Fabian Rauscher, Simone Franza, Daniel Gruss
USENIX Security Symposium4
2023 DOPE: DOmain Protection Enforcement with PKS
abstract
The number of Linux kernel vulnerabilities discovered has increased drastically over the past years. In the kernel, even simple memory safety vulnerabilities can have devastating consequences, e.g., compromising the entire system. Efforts to mitigate these vulnerabilities have so far focused mainly on control-flow hijacking attacks in the kernel. Yet, data-oriented attacks remain largely unmitigated in practice as existing mitigations are limited in providing robust security guarantees at reasonable performance overhead for multiple sensitive data objects.
Lukas Maar, Martin Schwarzl, Fabian Rauscher, Daniel Gruss, Stefan Mangard
ACSAC3