Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Casey Wall

dblp:362/6539 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-9973-6007ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
Winsor-CAM: Human-Tunable Visual Explanations From Deep Networks via Layer-Wise Winsorization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
visual explanation of neural networks
1.012026
Winsor-CAM: Human-Tunable Visual Explanations From Deep Networks via Layer-Wise Winsorization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
convolutional neural network interpretation
0.312026
Winsor-CAM: Human-Tunable Visual Explanations From Deep Networks via Layer-Wise Winsorization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

winsorization · 1.0layer-wise aggregation · 1.0gradient-based saliency · 1.0Grad-CAM · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Winsor-CAM: Human-Tunable Visual Explanations From Deep Networks via Layer-Wise Winsorization
abstract
Interpreting Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is critical for safety-sensitive applications such as healthcare and autonomous systems. Popular visual explanation methods like Grad-CAM use a single convolutional layer, potentially missing multi-scale cues and producing unstable saliency maps. We introduce Winsor-CAM, a single-pass gradient-based method that aggregates Grad-CAM maps from all convolutional layers and applies percentile-based Winsorization to attenuate outlier contributions. A user-controllable percentile parameter $p$p enables semantic-level tuning from low-level textures to high-level object patterns. We evaluate Winsor-CAM on six CNN architectures using PASCAL VOC 2012 and PolypGen, comparing localization (IoU, center-of-mass distance) and fidelity (insertion/deletion AUC) against seven baselines including Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, LayerCAM, ScoreCAM, AblationCAM, ShapleyCAM, and FullGrad. On DenseNet121 with a subset of Pascal VOC 2012, Winsor-CAM achieves 46.8% IoU and 0.059 CoM distance versus 39.0% and 0.074 for Grad-CAM, with improved insertion AUC (0.656vs. 0.623) and deletion AUC (0.197vs. 0.242). Notably, even the worst-performing fixed $p$p-value configuration outperforms FullGrad across all metrics. An ablation study confirms that incorporating earlier layers improves localization. Similar evaluation on PolypGen polyp segmentation further validates Winsor-CAM's effectiveness in medical imaging contexts. Winsor-CAM provides an efficient, robust, and human-tunable explanation tool for expert-in-the-loop analysis.
Casey Wall, Longwei Wang, Rodrigue Rizk, KC Santosh
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2025 The PARES Database: Information Extraction over Historical Parish Records
abstract
Abstract Historical census records convey information that is key to perform genealogical research and demographic studies. Given the large number of documents of this type that exist, it is crucial to research methods that allow the automatic extraction of information from this type of document. In this work, we present a new corpus of this kind, comprising 535 historical census tables from French archives. Alongside this dataset, we have assessed three different baseline methods for information extraction. The first two methods employ a traditional sequential approach, where table rows are detected before extracting information. The third baseline uses an end-to-end model that directly extracts information from the table images without prior row detection. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of all three baselines in tackling the information extraction task.
José Andrés, Casey Wall, Solène Tarride, Mickaël Coustaty, Alejandro H. Toselli, Enrique Vidal 0001
Int. J. Document Anal. Recognit.2