Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kaylyn Jackson Schiff

dblp:363/3778 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4239-5915ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image manipulation
deepfake
0.812024
Merging AI Incidents Research with Political Misinformation Research: Introducing the Political Deepfakes Incidents Database · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

database construction · 2.3content coding · 2.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Merging AI Incidents Research with Political Misinformation Research: Introducing the Political Deepfakes Incidents Database
abstract
This article presents the Political Deepfakes Incidents Database (PDID), a collection of politically-salient deepfakes, encompassing synthetically-created videos, images, and less-sophisticated `cheapfakes.' The project is driven by the rise of generative AI in politics, ongoing policy efforts to address harms, and the need to connect AI incidents and political communication research. The database contains political deepfake content, metadata, and researcher-coded descriptors drawn from political science, public policy, communication, and misinformation studies. It aims to help reveal the prevalence, trends, and impact of political deepfakes, such as those featuring major political figures or events. The PDID can benefit policymakers, researchers, journalists, fact-checkers, and the public by providing insights into deepfake usage, aiding in regulation, enabling in-depth analyses, supporting fact-checking and trust-building efforts, and raising awareness of political deepfakes. It is suitable for research and application on media effects, political discourse, AI ethics, technology governance, media literacy, and countermeasures.
Christina P. Walker, Daniel S. Schiff, Kaylyn Jackson Schiff
AAAI3
2024 Introducing the AI Governance and Regulatory Archive (AGORA): An Analytic Infrastructure for Navigating the Emerging AI Governance Landscape
abstract
AI-related laws, standards, and norms are emerging rapidly. However, a lack of shared descriptive concepts and monitoring infrastructure undermine efforts to track, understand, and improve AI governance. We introduce AGORA (the AI Governance and Regulatory Archive), a rigorously compiled and enriched dataset of AI-focused laws and policies encompassing diverse jurisdictions, institutions, and contexts related to AI. AGORA is oriented around an original taxonomy describing risks, potential harms, governance strategies, incentives for compliance, and application domains addressed in AI regulatory documents. At launch, AGORA included data on over 330 instruments, with new entries being added continuously. We describe the manual and automated processes through which these data are systematically compiled, screened, annotated, and validated, enabling deep, efficient, and reliable analysis of the emerging AI governance landscape. The dataset, supporting information, and analyses are available through a public web interface (https://agora.eto.tech) and bulk dataset.
Zachary Arnold, Daniel S. Schiff, Kaylyn Jackson Schiff, Brian Love, Jennifer Melot, Lindsay Jenkins, Ashley Lin, Konstantin Pilz, Ogadinma Enweareazu, Tyler Girard
AIES (1)3