Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Meihao Fan
dblp:363/7401
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7597-5599ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data integration and cleaning · 52% Data models and query languages · 32% Information retrieval · 10% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 54% Language models and text generation · 46% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data models and query languages › natural language interface › natural language interface to database
text-to-SQL |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TACO: A Benchmark for Open-Domain Text-to-SQL with Ambiguous and Cross-Database Queries · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
table question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoPrep: Natural Language Question-Aware Data Preparation with a Multi-Agent Framework · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Data integration and cleaning
data preprocessing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoPrep: Natural Language Question-Aware Data Preparation with a Multi-Agent Framework · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Cost-Effective In-Context Learning for Entity Resolution: A Design Space Exploration · ICDE 2024 |
Data integration and cleaning
entity resolution |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Cost-Effective In-Context Learning for Entity Resolution: A Design Space Exploration · ICDE 2024 |
Information retrieval
question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | TACO: A Benchmark for Open-Domain Text-to-SQL with Ambiguous and Cross-Database Queries · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026 |
Machine learning and data management › AI for data management
large language model for data management |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Cost-Effective In-Context Learning for Entity Resolution: A Design Space Exploration · ICDE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-agent framework · 1.7large language model · 1.7chain-of-clauses reasoning · 1.7in-context learning · 1.5demonstration selection · 1.5batch prompting · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | TACO: A Benchmark for Open-Domain Text-to-SQL with Ambiguous and Cross-Database Queries
Ju Fan, Yuyu Luo, Qinliang Xue, Meihao Fan, Jing Zhang 0001, Xiaoyong Du 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 5 |
| 2025 | AutoPrep: Natural Language Question-Aware Data Preparation with a Multi-Agent FrameworkabstractAnswering natural language (NL) questions about tables, known as Tabular Question Answering (TQA), is crucial because it allows users to quickly and efficiently extract meaningful insights from structured data, effectively bridging the gap between human language and machine-readable formats. Many of these tables are derived from web sources or real-world scenarios, which require meticulous data preparation (or data prep) to ensure accurate responses. However, preparing such tables for NL questions introduces new requirements that extend beyond traditional data preparation. This question-aware data preparation involves specific tasks such as column derivation and filtering tailored to particular questions, as well as question-aware value normalization or conversion, highlighting the need for a more nuanced approach in this context. Because each of the above tasks is unique, a single model (or agent) may not perform effectively across all scenarios. In this paper, we propose AutoPrep , a large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent framework that leverages the strengths of multiple agents, each specialized in a certain type of data prep, ensuring more accurate and contextually relevant responses. Given an NL question over a table, AutoPrep performs data prep through three key components. Planner : Determines a logical plan, outlining a sequence of high-level operations. Programmer : Translates this logical plan into a physical plan by generating the corresponding low-level code. Executor : Executes the generated code to process the table. To support this multi-agent framework, we design a novel Chain-of-Clauses reasoning mechanism for high-level operation suggestion, and a tool-augmented method for low-level code generation. Extensive experiments on real-world TQA datasets demonstrate that AutoPrep can significantly improve the state-of-the-art TQA solutions through question-aware data preparation. Meihao Fan, Ju Fan, Nan Tang 0001, Lei Cao 0004, Guoliang Li 0001, Xiaoyong Du 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2024 | Cost-Effective In-Context Learning for Entity Resolution: A Design Space ExplorationabstractEntity resolution (ER) is an important data integration task with a wide spectrum of applications. The state-of-the-art solutions on ER rely on pre-trained language models (PLMs), which require fine-tuning on a lot of labeled matching/non-matching entity pairs. Recently, large languages models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, have shown the ability to perform many tasks without tuning model parameters, which is known as in-context learning (ICL) that facilitates effective learning from a few labeled input context demonstrations. However, existing ICL approaches to ER typically necessitate providing a task description and a set of demonstrations for each entity pair and thus have limitations on the monetary cost of interfacing LLMs. To address the problem, in this paper, we provide a comprehensive study to investigate how to develop a cost-effective batch prompting approach to ER. We introduce a framework BATCHER consisting of demonstration selection and question batching and explore different design choices that support batch prompting for ER. We also devise a covering-based demonstration selection strategy that achieves an effective balance between matching accuracy and monetary cost. We conduct a thorough evaluation to explore the design space and evaluate our proposed strategies. Through extensive experiments, we find that batch prompting is very cost-effective for ER, compared with not only PLM-based methods fine-tuned with extensive labeled data but also LLM-based methods with manually designed prompting. We also provide guidance for selecting appropriate design choices for batch prompting. Meihao Fan, Xiaoyue Han, Ju Fan, Chengliang Chai, Nan Tang 0001, Guoliang Li 0001, Xiaoyong Du 0001 |
ICDE | 1 |