Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kacper Kapusniak

dblp:363/7484 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 95% Robot navigation and mapping · 5%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
1.622025
Curly Flow Matching for Learning Non-gradient Field Dynamics · NeurIPS 2025
Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
schrödinger bridge
0.912025
Curly Flow Matching for Learning Non-gradient Field Dynamics · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
conditional flow matching
0.812024
Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.812024
Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › sensor-based navigation
LiDAR-based navigation
0.212024
Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

schrödinger bridge problem · 0.9drift reference process · 0.9riemannian geometry · 0.8geodesic interpolation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Curly Flow Matching for Learning Non-gradient Field Dynamics
abstract
Modeling the transport dynamics of natural processes from population-level observations is a ubiquitous problem in the natural sciences. Such models rely on key assumptions about the underlying process in order to enable faithful learning of governing dynamics that mimic the actual system behavior. The de facto assumption in current approaches relies on the principle of least action that results in gradient field dynamics and leads to trajectories minimizing an energy functional between two probability measures. However, many real-world systems, such as cell cycles in single-cell RNA, are known to exhibit non-gradient, periodic behavior, which fundamentally cannot be captured by current state-of-the-art methods such as flow and bridge matching. In this paper, we introduce Curly Flow Matching (Curly-FM), a novel approach that is capable of learning non-gradient field dynamics by designing and solving a Schrödinger bridge problem with a non-zero drift reference process---in stark contrast to typical zero-drift reference processes---which is constructed using inferred velocities in addition to population snapshot data. We showcase Curly-FM by solving the trajectory inference problems for single cells, computational fluid dynamics, and ocean currents with approximate velocities. We demonstrate that Curly-FM can learn trajectories that better match both the reference process and population marginals. Curly-FM expands flow matching models beyond the modeling of populations and towards the modeling of known periodic behavior in physical systems. Our code repository is accessible at: https://github.com/kpetrovicc/curly-flow-matching.git
Katarina Petrovic, Lazar Atanackovic, Viggo Moro, Kacper Kapusniak, Ismail Ilkan Ceylan, Michael M. Bronstein, Joey Bose, Alexander Tong 0001
NeurIPS4
2024 Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold
abstract
Matching objectives underpin the success of modern generative models and rely on constructing conditional paths that transform a source distribution into a target distribution. Despite being a fundamental building block, conditional paths have been designed principally under the assumption of $\textit{Euclidean geometry}$, resulting in straight interpolations. However, this can be particularly restrictive for tasks such as trajectory inference, where straight paths might lie outside the data manifold, thus failing to capture the underlying dynamics giving rise to the observed marginals. In this paper, we propose Metric Flow Matching (MFM), a novel simulation-free framework for conditional flow matching where interpolants are approximate geodesics learned by minimizing the kinetic energy of a data-induced Riemannian metric. This way, the generative model matches vector fields on the data manifold, which corresponds to lower uncertainty and more meaningful interpolations. We prescribe general metrics to instantiate MFM, independent of the task, and test it on a suite of challenging problems including LiDAR navigation, unpaired image translation, and modeling cellular dynamics. We observe that MFM outperforms the Euclidean baselines, particularly achieving SOTA on single-cell trajectory prediction.
Kacper Kapusniak, Peter Potaptchik, Teodora Reu, Leo Zhang, Alexander Tong 0001, Michael M. Bronstein, Joey Bose, Francesco Di Giovanni
NeurIPS1