Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mehil B. Shah
dblp:366/5195
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-3584-0470ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 50% Debugging and program repair · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing
fault detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improved Detection and Diagnosis of Faults in Deep Neural Networks Using Hierarchical and Explainable Classification · ICSE 2025 |
Debugging and program repair
root cause analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improved Detection and Diagnosis of Faults in Deep Neural Networks Using Hierarchical and Explainable Classification · ICSE 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical classification · 0.9explainable AI · 0.9SHAP · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Improved Detection and Diagnosis of Faults in Deep Neural Networks Using Hierarchical and Explainable ClassificationabstractDeep Neural Networks (DNN) have found numerous applications in various domains, including fraud detection, medical diagnosis, facial recognition, and autonomous driving. However, D NN - based systems often suffer from reliability issues due to their inherent complexity and the stochastic nature of their underlying models. Unfortunately, existing techniques to detect faults in DNN programs are either limited by the types of faults (e.g., hyperparameter or layer) they support or the kind of information (e.g., dynamic or static) they use. As a result, they might fall short of comprehensively detecting and diagnosing the faults. In this paper, we present DEFault (Detect and Explain Fault) - a novel technique to detect and diagnose faults in DNN programs. It first captures dynamic (i.e., runtime) features during model training and leverages a hierarchical classification approach to detect all major fault categories from the literature. Then, it captures static features (e.g., layer types) from DNN programs and leverages explainable AI methods (e.g., SHAP) to narrow down the root cause of the fault. We train and evaluate DEFault on a large, diverse dataset of ≈ 14.5K DNN programs and further validate our technique using a benchmark dataset of 52 real-life faulty DNN programs. Our approach achieves≈ 94% recall in detecting real-world faulty DNN programs and ≈ 63% recall in diagnosing the root causes of the faults, demonstrating 3.92%-11.54% higher performance than that of state-of-the-art techniques. Thus, DEFault has the potential to significantly improve the reliability of DNN programs by effectively detecting and diagnosing the faults. Sigma Jahan, Mehil B. Shah, Parvez Mahbub, Mohammad Masudur Rahman 0001 |
ICSE | 2 |
| 2025 | Towards understanding the challenges of bug localization in deep learning systems
Sigma Jahan, Mehil B. Shah, Mohammad Masudur Rahman 0001 |
Empir. Softw. Eng. | 2 |
| 2025 | Towards enhancing the reproducibility of deep learning bugs: an empirical study
Mehil B. Shah, Mohammad Masudur Rahman 0001, Foutse Khomh |
Empir. Softw. Eng. | 1 |
| 2025 | Towards understanding the impact of data bugs on deep learning models in software engineering
Mehil B. Shah, Mohammad Masudur Rahman 0001, Foutse Khomh |
Empir. Softw. Eng. | 1 |