Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Miguel Monares
dblp:366/7247
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 56% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | I am a Strange Dataset: Metalinguistic Tests for Language Models · ACL (1) 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
metalinguistic reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | I am a Strange Dataset: Metalinguistic Tests for Language Models · ACL (1) 2024 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | I am a Strange Dataset: Metalinguistic Tests for Language ModelsabstractStatements involving metalinguistic selfreference ("This paper has six sections.")are prevalent in many domains.Can current large language models (LLMs) handle such language?In this paper, we present "I am a Strange Dataset", a new dataset for addressing this question.There are two subtasks: generation and verification.In generation, models continue statements like "The penultimate word in this sentence is" (where a correct continuation is "is").In verification, models judge the truth of statements like "The penultimate word in this sentence is sentence."(false).We also provide minimally different metalinguistic non-self-reference examples to complement the main dataset by probing for whether models can handle metalinguistic language at all.The dataset is hand-crafted by experts and validated by non-expert annotators.We test a variety of open-source LLMs (7B to 70B parameters) as well as closed-source LLMs through APIs.All models perform close to chance across both subtasks and even on the non-self-referential metalinguistic control data, though we find some steady improvement with model scale.GPT 4 is the only model to consistently do significantly better than chance, and it is still only in the 60% range, while our untrained human annotators score well in the 89-93% range.The dataset and evaluation toolkit are available at https://github.com/ TristanThrush/i-am-a-strange-dataset. Tristan Thrush, Jared Moore, Miguel Monares, Christopher Potts, Douwe Kiela |
ACL (1) | 3 |