Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Taylor Lopez

dblp:367/5872 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-1214-5903ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.812024
Characterizing Software Maintenance Meetings: Information Shared, Discussion Outcomes, and Information Captured · ICSE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 0.8case study · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Characterizing Software Maintenance Meetings: Information Shared, Discussion Outcomes, and Information Captured
abstract
A type of meeting that has been understudied in the software engineering literature to date is what we term the software maintenance meeting: a regularly scheduled team meeting in which emergent issues are addressed that are usually out of scope of the daily stand-up but not necessarily challenging enough to warrant an entirely separate meeting. These meetings tend to discuss a wide variety of topics and are crucial in keeping software development projects going, but little is known about these meetings and how they proceed. In this paper, we report on a single exploratory case study in which we analyzed ten consecutive maintenance meetings from a major healthcare software provider. We analyzed what kind of information is brought into the discussions held in these meetings and how, what outcomes arose from the discussions, and what information was captured for downstream use. Our findings are varied, giving rise to both practical considerations for those conducting these kinds of meetings and new research directions toward further understanding and supporting them.
Adriana Meza Soria, Taylor Lopez, Elizabeth Seero, Negin Mashhadi, Emily Evans, Janet E. Burge, André van der Hoek
ICSE2