Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joana Tirana

dblp:367/7092 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-2648-6735ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 86% Learning paradigms · 14%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
2.632026
Data Heterogeneity and Forgotten Labels in Split Federated Learning · AAAI 2026
Minimization of the Training Makespan in Hybrid Federated Split Learning · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025
Workflow Optimization for Parallel Split Learning · INFOCOM 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › distributed DNN training
split learning
1.622025
Minimization of the Training Makespan in Hybrid Federated Split Learning · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025
Workflow Optimization for Parallel Split Learning · INFOCOM 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting
1.012026
Data Heterogeneity and Forgotten Labels in Split Federated Learning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity
1.012026
Data Heterogeneity and Forgotten Labels in Split Federated Learning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › federated learning architecture
split federated learning
1.012026
Data Heterogeneity and Forgotten Labels in Split Federated Learning · AAAI 2026
Internet of things and sensor networks
resource-constrained devices
0.312025
Minimization of the Training Makespan in Hybrid Federated Split Learning · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis › scheduling
makespan minimization
0.212024
Workflow Optimization for Parallel Split Learning · INFOCOM 2024
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
scheduling
0.212024
Workflow Optimization for Parallel Split Learning · INFOCOM 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

NP-hardness proof · 3.3scheduling · 1.7decomposition · 1.7decomposition method · 1.5combinatorial optimization · 1.5multi-head neural network · 1.0continual learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Data Heterogeneity and Forgotten Labels in Split Federated Learning
abstract
In Split Federated Learning (SFL), the clients collaboratively train a model with the help of a server by splitting the model into two parts. Part-1 is trained locally at each client and aggregated by the aggregator at the end of each round. Part-2 is trained at a server that sequentially processes the intermediate activations received from each client. We study the phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting (CF) in SFL in the presence of data heterogeneity. In detail, due to the nature of SFL, local updates of part-1 may drift away from global optima, while part-2 is sensitive to the processing sequence, similar to forgetting in continual learning (CL). Specifically, we observe that the trained model performs better in classes (labels) seen at the end of the sequence. We investigate this phenomenon with emphasis on key aspects of SFL, such as the processing order at the server and the cut layer. Based on our findings, we propose Hydra, a novel mitigation method inspired by multi-head neural networks and adapted for the SFL setting. Extensive numerical evaluations show that Hydra outperforms baselines and methods from the literature.
Joana Tirana, Dimitra Tsigkari, David Solans Noguero, Nicolas Kourtellis
AAAI1
2025 Minimization of the Training Makespan in Hybrid Federated Split Learning
abstract
Parallel Split Learning (SL) allows resource-constrained devices that cannot participate in Federated Learning (FL) to train deep neural networks (NNs) by splitting the NN model into parts. In particular, such devices (clients) may offload the processing task of the largest model part to a computationally powerful helper, and multiple helpers may be employed and work in parallel. In hybrid federated and split learning (HFSL), on the other hand, devices can participate in the training process through any of the two protocols (SL and FL), depending on the system's characteristics. This could considerably reduce the maximum training time over all clients (makespan), especially in highly heterogeneous scenarios. In this paper, we study the joint problem of the training protocol selection, client-helper assignments, and scheduling decisions, to minimize the training makespan. We prove this problem is NP-hard and propose two solution methods: one based on the decomposition of the problem by leveraging its inherent symmetry, and a second fully scalable one. Through numerical evaluations using our testbed's measurements, we build a solution strategy comprising these methods. Moreover, this strategy finds a near-optimal solution and achieves a shorter makespan than the baseline schemes by up to 71%.
Joana Tirana, Dimitra Tsigkari, George Iosifidis, Dimitris Chatzopoulos
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.1
2024 Workflow Optimization for Parallel Split Learning
abstract
Split learning (SL) has been recently proposed as a way to enable resource-constrained devices to train multi-parameter neural networks (NNs) and participate in federated learning (FL). In a nutshell, SL splits the NN model into parts, and allows clients (devices) to offload the largest part as a processing task to a computationally powerful helper. In parallel SL, multiple helpers can process model parts of one or more clients, thus, considerably reducing the maximum training time over all clients (makespan). In this paper, we focus on orchestrating the workflow of this operation, which is critical in highly heterogeneous systems, as our experiments show. In particular, we formulate the joint problem of client-helper assignments and scheduling decisions with the goal of minimizing the training makespan, and we prove that it is NPhard. We propose a solution method based on the decomposition of the problem by leveraging its inherent symmetry, and a second one that is fully scalable. A wealth of numerical evaluations using our testbed’s measurements allow us to build a solution strategy comprising these methods. Moreover, we show that this strategy finds a near-optimal solution, and achieves a shorter makespan than the baseline scheme by up to 52.3%.
Joana Tirana, Dimitra Tsigkari, George Iosifidis, Dimitris Chatzopoulos
INFOCOM1