Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sreejata Kishor Bhattacharya

dblp:367/9524 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-3530-3320ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
lower bounds
1.822026
Lower Bounds for Near-Quadratic-Depth Resolution over Parities · STOC 2026
Exponential Separation Between Powers of Regular and General Resolution over Parities · CCC 2024
Computational complexity
proof complexity
1.822026
Lower Bounds for Near-Quadratic-Depth Resolution over Parities · STOC 2026
Exponential Separation Between Powers of Regular and General Resolution over Parities · CCC 2024
Computational complexity › proof complexity
resolution over parities
1.822026
Lower Bounds for Near-Quadratic-Depth Resolution over Parities · STOC 2026
Exponential Separation Between Powers of Regular and General Resolution over Parities · CCC 2024
Computational complexity › boolean function complexity
and-functions
1.012026
Quantum-Classical Equivalence for And-Functions · CCC 2026
Computational complexity › query complexity
quantum query complexity
1.012026
Quantum-Classical Equivalence for And-Functions · CCC 2026
Computational complexity
query complexity
1.012026
Quantum-Classical Equivalence for And-Functions · CCC 2026
Computational complexity › proof complexity › resolution
regular resolution
0.812024
Exponential Separation Between Powers of Regular and General Resolution over Parities · CCC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantum query · 1.0lifting theorem · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Quantum-Classical Equivalence for And-Functions
Sreejata Kishor Bhattacharya, Farzan Byramji, Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Yogesh Dahiya, Shachar Lovett
CCC1
2026 Lower Bounds for Near-Quadratic-Depth Resolution over Parities
abstract
Resolution over parities (Res(⊕)) is a proof system introduced by Itsykson and Sokolov [MFCS ’14] as a stepping stone towards proving AC0[2]-Frege lower bounds. A recent line of work has established lower bounds against depth-restricted Res(⊕) refutations. Prior to this work, the state of the art was exponential lower bounds against depth O(N logN) Res(⊕) proved by Efremenko and Itsykson [CCC ’25], where N is the number of variables in the CNF. In this work we prove exponential lower bounds against depth O(N2−є) Res(⊕) refutations. The lifted Tseitin formula we consider has O(N) clauses of width 6, which lets the allowed depth be almost quadratic not only in the number of variables, but also in the CNF size. We also prove depth-restricted lower bounds for variants of the bit pigeonhole principle (BPHP), including an exponential lower bound for depth O(n2−є) Res(⊕) refutations of BPHP with n+1 pigeons and n holes.
Sreejata Kishor Bhattacharya, Farzan Byramji, Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Russell Impagliazzo
STOC1
2025 Random Restrictions of Bounded Low Degree Polynomials Are Juntas
abstract
We study the effects of random restrictions on low degree functions that are bounded on every point of the Boolean cube. Our main result shows that, with high probability, the restricted function can be approximated by a junta of arity that is just polynomial in the original degree. More precisely, let f: {± 1}ⁿ → [0,1] be a degree d polynomial (d ≥ 2) and let ρ denote a random restriction with survival probability O(log(d)/d). Then, with probability at least 1-d^{-Ω(1)}, there exists a function g: {± 1}ⁿ → [0,1] depending on at most d^O(1) coordinates such that ||f_{ρ}-g||_2^2 ≤ d^{-1-Ω(1)}. Our result has the following consequence for the well known, outstanding conjecture of Aaronson and Ambainis. The Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture was formulated to show that the acceptance probability of a quantum query algorithm can be well approximated almost everywhere by a classical query algorithm with a polynomial blow-up: it speculates that a polynomal f: {± 1}ⁿ → [0,1] with degree d has a coordinate with influence ≥ poly(1/d, Var[f]). Our result shows that this is true for a non-negligible fraction of random restrictions of f assuming Var[f] is not too low. Our work combines the ideas of Dinur, Friedgut, Kindler and O'Donnell [Dinur et al., 2006] with an approximation theoretic result, first reported in the recent work of Filmus, Hatami, Keller and Lifshitz [Yuval Filmus and Hamed Hatami, 2014].
Sreejata Kishor Bhattacharya
ITCS1
2024 Exponential Separation Between Powers of Regular and General Resolution over Parities
abstract
Proving super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of proofs of unsatisfiability of Boolean formulas using resolution over parities is an outstanding problem that has received a lot of attention after its introduction by Raz and Tzamaret [Ann. Pure Appl. Log.'08]. Very recently, Efremenko, Garlík and Itsykson [ECCC'23] proved the first exponential lower bounds on the size of ResLin proofs that were additionally restricted to be bottom-regular. We show that there are formulas for which such regular ResLin proofs of unsatisfiability continue to have exponential size even though there exists short proofs of their unsatisfiability in ordinary, non-regular resolution. This is the first super-polynomial separation between the power of general ResLin and and that of regular ResLin for any natural notion of regularity. Our argument, while building upon the work of Efremenko et al., uses additional ideas from the literature on lifting theorems.
Sreejata Kishor Bhattacharya, Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Pavel Dvorák
CCC1