Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Felix B. Mueller

dblp:369/5954 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 44% Autonomous driving · 44% 3D vision · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
human motion prediction
0.712023
Humans in Kitchens: A Dataset for Multi-Person Human Motion Forecasting with Scene Context · NeurIPS 2023
Robotics › Autonomous driving › trajectory prediction
multi-person motion prediction
0.712023
Humans in Kitchens: A Dataset for Multi-Person Human Motion Forecasting with Scene Context · NeurIPS 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d human pose estimation
0.212023
Humans in Kitchens: A Dataset for Multi-Person Human Motion Forecasting with Scene Context · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parametric 3d body model · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 LLMs and Memorization: On Quality and Specificity of Copyright Compliance
abstract
Memorization in large language models (LLMs) is a growing concern. LLMs have been shown to easily reproduce parts of their training data, including copyrighted work. This is an important problem to solve, as it may violate existing copyright laws as well as the European AI Act. In this work, we propose a systematic analysis to quantify the extent of potential copyright infringements in LLMs using European law as an example. Unlike previous work, we evaluate instruction-finetuned models in a realistic end-user scenario. Our analysis builds on a proposed threshold of 160 characters, which we borrow from the German Copyright Service Provider Act and a fuzzy text matching algorithm to identify potentially copyright-infringing textual reproductions. The specificity of countermeasures against copyright infringement is analyzed by comparing model behavior on copyrighted and public domain data. We investigate what behaviors models show instead of producing protected text (such as refusal or hallucination) and provide a first legal assessment of these behaviors. We find that there are huge differences in copyright compliance, specificity, and appropriate refusal among popular LLMs. Alpaca, GPT 4, GPT 3.5, and Luminous perform best in our comparison, with OpenGPT-X, Alpaca, and Luminous producing a particularly low absolute number of potential copyright violations. Code can be found at github.com/felixbmuller/llms-memorization-copyright.
Felix B. Mueller, Rebekka Görge, Anna K. Bernzen, Janna C. Pirk, Maximilian Poretschkin
AIES (1)1
2023 Humans in Kitchens: A Dataset for Multi-Person Human Motion Forecasting with Scene Context
abstract
Forecasting human motion of multiple persons is very challenging. It requires to model the interactions between humans and the interactions with objects and the environment. For example, a person might want to make a coffee, but if the coffee machine is already occupied the person will haveto wait. These complex relations between scene geometry and persons ariseconstantly in our daily lives, and models that wish to accurately forecasthuman behavior will have to take them into consideration. To facilitate research in this direction, we propose Humans in Kitchens, alarge-scale multi-person human motion dataset with annotated 3D human poses, scene geometry and activities per person and frame.Our dataset consists of over 7.3h recorded data of up to 16 persons at the same time in four kitchen scenes, with more than 4M annotated human poses, represented by a parametric 3D body model. In addition, dynamic scene geometry and objects like chair or cupboard are annotated per frame. As first benchmarks, we propose two protocols for short-term and long-term human motion forecasting.
Julian Tanke, Oh-Hun Kwon, Felix B. Mueller, Andreas Doering, Juergen Gall
NeurIPS3