Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bethina Schmitt

dblp:37/1659 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning › data extraction › web data extraction
wrapper generation
0.012002
ExWrap: semi-automatic wrapper generation by example · SIGIR 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

programming by example · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 ExWrap: semi-automatic wrapper generation by example
Bethina Schmitt, Michael Christoffel, Jürgen Schneider
SIGIR1
2002 Evaluating and Enhancing Meta-Search Performance in Digital Libraries
abstract
Applying meta search systems is a suitable method for supporting the user if there are many different retrieval services available on the Web. Due to information splitting strategies of literature services existing meta search systems either provide minimal integration of results or slow response times. We present an approach that combines techniques of personalization and query processing in order to satisfy the user's demand for both fast and comprehensive results. In order to evaluate and compare different query processing strategies and additional influencing parameters we developed a simulation tool called SIMPSON. Thereby, we can observe the performance of query processing within the context of different response times of the underlying digital library services in the Web, with different kinds of user queries, and with different sizes of query results. To evaluate and compare the performance of different query processing and duplicate detection strategies we developed metrics, particularly with regard to user satisfaction. We present results from our first experiments with SIMPSON, focusing on duplicate detection, query specification, and Web server performance of the underlying digital library services.
Bethina Schmitt, Sven Oberländer
WISE1