Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard Strong Bowen

dblp:37/5252 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-9628-5471ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
5 papers
Computational photography and imaging · 50% Image and video processing · 32% Visual content generation and editing · 18%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 85% Image recognition and object detection · 15%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Medical and health informatics · 50%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational photography and imaging
image stitching
0.722018
Object-Centered Image Stitching · ECCV (3) 2018
Robust Image Stitching with Multiple Registrations · ECCV (2) 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis
0.512021
Deep survival analysis with longitudinal X-rays for COVID-19 · ICCV 2021
Visual content generation and editing
image outpainting
0.512021
OCONet: Image Extrapolation by Object Completion · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › structured pruning
channel selection
0.412020
Channel Selection Using Gumbel Softmax · ECCV (27) 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
0.412020
Channel Selection Using Gumbel Softmax · ECCV (27) 2020
Computational photography and imaging › image acquisition › imaging system design › camera design
autofocus
0.412020
Learning to Autofocus · CVPR 2020
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.412020
Channel Selection Using Gumbel Softmax · ECCV (27) 2020
Image and video processing
image registration
0.312018
Robust Image Stitching with Multiple Registrations · ECCV (2) 2018
Computational photography and imaging › image stitching
robust image stitching
0.312018
Robust Image Stitching with Multiple Registrations · ECCV (2) 2018
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
medical image analysis
0.112021
Deep survival analysis with longitudinal X-rays for COVID-19 · ICCV 2021
Image and video processing › image restoration
image inpainting
0.112021
OCONet: Image Extrapolation by Object Completion · CVPR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 1.4cox model · 1.0gumbel-softmax · 0.9signed distance field · 0.5encoder-decoder network · 0.5adversarial loss · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Dimensions of Motion: Monocular Prediction through Flow Subspaces
abstract
We introduce a way to learn to estimate a scene representation from a single image by predicting a low-dimensional subspace of optical flow for each training example, which encompasses the variety of possible camera and object movement. Supervision is provided by a novel loss which measures the distance between this predicted flow subspace and an observed optical flow. This provides a new approach to learning scene representation tasks, such as monocular depth prediction or instance segmentation, in an unsupervised fashion using in-the-wild input videos without requiring camera poses, intrinsics, or an explicit multi-view stereo step. We evaluate our method in multiple settings, including an indoor depth prediction task where it achieves comparable performance to recent methods trained with more supervision. Our project page is at https://dimensions-of-motion.github.io/.
Richard Strong Bowen, Richard Tucker 0001, Ramin Zabih, Noah Snavely
3DV1
2021 OCONet: Image Extrapolation by Object Completion
abstract
Image extrapolation extends an input image beyond the originally-captured field of view. Existing methods struggle to extrapolate images with salient objects in the foreground or are limited to very specific objects such as humans, but tend to work well on indoor/outdoor scenes. We introduce OCONet (Object COmpletion Networks) to extrapolate foreground objects, with an object completion network conditioned on its class. OCONet uses an encoder-decoder architecture trained with adversarial loss to predict the object’s texture as well as its extent, represented as a predicted signed-distance field. An independent step extends the background, and the object is composited on top using the predicted mask. Both qualitative and quantitative results show that we improve on state-of-the-art image extrapolation results for challenging examples.
Richard Strong Bowen, Huiwen Chang, Charles Herrmann, Piotr Teterwak, Ce Liu 0001, Ramin Zabih
CVPR1
2021 Deep survival analysis with longitudinal X-rays for COVID-19
abstract
Time-to-event analysis is an important statistical tool for allocating clinical resources such as ICU beds. However, classical techniques like the Cox model cannot directly incorporate images due to their high dimensionality. We propose a deep learning approach that naturally incorporates multiple, time-dependent imaging studies as well as non-imaging data into time-to-event analysis. Our techniques are bench-marked on a clinical dataset of 1,894 COVID-19 patients, and show that image sequences significantly improve predictions. For example, classical time-to-event methods produce a concordance error of around 30-40% for predicting hospital admission, while our error is 25% without images and 20% with multiple X-rays included. Ablation studies suggest that our models are not learning spurious features such as scanner artifacts and that models which use multiple images tend to perform better than those which only use one. While our focus and evaluation is on COVID-19, the methods we develop are broadly applicable.
Michelle Shu, Richard Strong Bowen, Charles Herrmann, Gengmo Qi, Michele Santacatterina, Ramin Zabih
ICCV2
2020 Learning to Autofocus
Charles Herrmann, Richard Strong Bowen, Neal Wadhwa, Rahul Garg 0002, Qiurui He 0001, Jonathan T. Barron, Ramin Zabih
CVPR2
2020 Channel Selection Using Gumbel Softmax
Charles Herrmann, Richard Strong Bowen, Ramin Zabih
ECCV (27)2
2018 Robust Image Stitching with Multiple Registrations
Charles Herrmann, Chen Wang 0050, Richard Strong Bowen, Emil Keyder, Michael Krainin, Ce Liu 0001, Ramin Zabih
ECCV (2)3
2018 Object-Centered Image Stitching
Charles Herrmann, Chen Wang 0050, Richard Strong Bowen, Emil Keyder, Ramin Zabih
ECCV (3)3