Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephen Tratz

dblp:37/6217 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 95% Learning theory · 5%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
non-projective dependency parsing
0.112011
A Fast, Accurate, Non-Projective, Semantically-Enriched Parser · EMNLP 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.112011
A Fast, Accurate, Non-Projective, Semantically-Enriched Parser · EMNLP 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › multiword expression
noun compound interpretation
0.112010
A Taxonomy, Dataset, and Classifier for Automatic Noun Compound Interpretation · ACL 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.012011
A Fast, Accurate, Non-Projective, Semantically-Enriched Parser · EMNLP 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.012010
A Taxonomy, Dataset, and Classifier for Automatic Noun Compound Interpretation · ACL 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic enrichment · 0.1taxonomy construction · 0.1classifier · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Dialogue-AMR: Abstract Meaning Representation for Dialogue
abstract
This paper describes a schema that enriches Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) in order to provide a semantic representation for facilitating Natural Language Understanding (NLU) in dialogue systems. AMR offers a valuable level of abstraction of the propositional content of an utterance; however, it does not capture the illocutionary force or speaker’s intended contribution in the broader dialogue context (e.g., make a request or ask a question), nor does it capture tense or aspect. We explore dialogue in the domain of human-robot interaction, where a conversational robot is engaged in search and navigation tasks with a human partner. To address the limitations of standard AMR, we develop an inventory of speech acts suitable for our domain, and present “Dialogue-AMR”, an enhanced AMR that represents not only the content of an utterance, but the illocutionary force behind it, as well as tense and aspect. To showcase the coverage of the schema, we use both manual and automatic methods to construct the “DialAMR” corpus—a corpus of human-robot dialogue annotated with standard AMR and our enriched Dialogue-AMR schema. Our automated methods can be used to incorporate AMR into a larger NLU pipeline supporting human-robot dialogue.
Claire Bonial, Lucia Donatelli, Mitchell Abrams, Stephanie M. Lukin, Stephen Tratz, Matthew Marge, Ron Artstein, David R. Traum, Clare R. Voss
LREC5
2018 A Web-based System for Crowd-in-the-Loop Dependency Treebanking
Stephen Tratz, Nhien Phan
LREC1
2016 EasyTree: A Graphical Tool for Dependency Tree Annotation
Alexa Little, Stephen Tratz
LREC2
2014 Finding Romanized Arabic Dialect in Code-Mixed Tweets
Clare R. Voss, Stephen Tratz, Jamal Laoudi, Douglas M. Briesch
LREC2
2013 Automatic Interpretation of the English Possessive
Stephen Tratz, Eduard H. Hovy
ACL (1)1
2013 Automatic human utility evaluation of ASR systems: does WER really predict performance?
abstract
International audience
Benoît Favre, Kyla Cheung, Siavash Kazemian, Adam Lee, Yang Liu 0004, Cosmin Munteanu, Ani Nenkova, Dennis Ochei, Gerald Penn, Stephen Tratz, Clare R. Voss, Frauke Zeller
INTERSPEECH10
2011 A Fast, Accurate, Non-Projective, Semantically-Enriched Parser
Stephen Tratz, Eduard H. Hovy
EMNLP1
2010 A Taxonomy, Dataset, and Classifier for Automatic Noun Compound Interpretation
Stephen Tratz, Eduard H. Hovy
ACL1
2007 Content Analysis for Proactive Intelligence: Marshaling Frame Evidence
Antonio Sanfilippo, Andrew J. Cowell, Stephen Tratz, A. M. Boek, Amanda K. Cowell, Christian Posse, Line C. Pouchard
AAAI3
2006 Word Domain Disambiguation via Word Sense Disambiguation
Antonio Sanfilippo, Stephen Tratz, Michelle L. Gregory
HLT-NAACL2
2005 Enabling massive scale document transformation for the semantic web: the universal parsing agent™
abstract
The Universal Parsing Agent (UPA) is a document analysis and transformation program that supports massive scale conversion of information into forms suitable for the semantic web. UPA provides reusable tools to analyze text documents; identify and extract important information elements; enhance text with semantically descriptive tags; and output the information that is needed in the format and structure that is needed.
Mark A. Whiting, Wendy Cowley, Nick Cramer, Alex Gibson, Ryan Hohimer, Ryan Scott, Stephen Tratz
ACM Symposium on Document Engineering7