Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephen Tratz
dblp:37/6217
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 95% Learning theory · 5% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
non-projective dependency parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A Fast, Accurate, Non-Projective, Semantically-Enriched Parser · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A Fast, Accurate, Non-Projective, Semantically-Enriched Parser · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › multiword expression
noun compound interpretation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A Taxonomy, Dataset, and Classifier for Automatic Noun Compound Interpretation · ACL 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | A Fast, Accurate, Non-Projective, Semantically-Enriched Parser · EMNLP 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | A Taxonomy, Dataset, and Classifier for Automatic Noun Compound Interpretation · ACL 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semantic enrichment · 0.1taxonomy construction · 0.1classifier · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Dialogue-AMR: Abstract Meaning Representation for DialogueabstractThis paper describes a schema that enriches Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) in order to provide a semantic representation for facilitating Natural Language Understanding (NLU) in dialogue systems. AMR offers a valuable level of abstraction of the propositional content of an utterance; however, it does not capture the illocutionary force or speaker’s intended contribution in the broader dialogue context (e.g., make a request or ask a question), nor does it capture tense or aspect. We explore dialogue in the domain of human-robot interaction, where a conversational robot is engaged in search and navigation tasks with a human partner. To address the limitations of standard AMR, we develop an inventory of speech acts suitable for our domain, and present “Dialogue-AMR”, an enhanced AMR that represents not only the content of an utterance, but the illocutionary force behind it, as well as tense and aspect. To showcase the coverage of the schema, we use both manual and automatic methods to construct the “DialAMR” corpus—a corpus of human-robot dialogue annotated with standard AMR and our enriched Dialogue-AMR schema. Our automated methods can be used to incorporate AMR into a larger NLU pipeline supporting human-robot dialogue. Claire Bonial, Lucia Donatelli, Mitchell Abrams, Stephanie M. Lukin, Stephen Tratz, Matthew Marge, Ron Artstein, David R. Traum, Clare R. Voss |
LREC | 5 |
| 2018 | A Web-based System for Crowd-in-the-Loop Dependency Treebanking
Stephen Tratz, Nhien Phan |
LREC | 1 |
| 2016 | EasyTree: A Graphical Tool for Dependency Tree Annotation
Alexa Little, Stephen Tratz |
LREC | 2 |
| 2014 | Finding Romanized Arabic Dialect in Code-Mixed Tweets
Clare R. Voss, Stephen Tratz, Jamal Laoudi, Douglas M. Briesch |
LREC | 2 |
| 2013 | Automatic Interpretation of the English Possessive
Stephen Tratz, Eduard H. Hovy |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2013 | Automatic human utility evaluation of ASR systems: does WER really predict performance?abstractInternational audience Benoît Favre, Kyla Cheung, Siavash Kazemian, Adam Lee, Yang Liu 0004, Cosmin Munteanu, Ani Nenkova, Dennis Ochei, Gerald Penn, Stephen Tratz, Clare R. Voss, Frauke Zeller |
INTERSPEECH | 10 |
| 2011 | A Fast, Accurate, Non-Projective, Semantically-Enriched Parser
Stephen Tratz, Eduard H. Hovy |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | A Taxonomy, Dataset, and Classifier for Automatic Noun Compound Interpretation
Stephen Tratz, Eduard H. Hovy |
ACL | 1 |
| 2007 | Content Analysis for Proactive Intelligence: Marshaling Frame Evidence
Antonio Sanfilippo, Andrew J. Cowell, Stephen Tratz, A. M. Boek, Amanda K. Cowell, Christian Posse, Line C. Pouchard |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2006 | Word Domain Disambiguation via Word Sense Disambiguation
Antonio Sanfilippo, Stephen Tratz, Michelle L. Gregory |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2005 | Enabling massive scale document transformation for the semantic web: the universal parsing agent™abstractThe Universal Parsing Agent (UPA) is a document analysis and transformation program that supports massive scale conversion of information into forms suitable for the semantic web. UPA provides reusable tools to analyze text documents; identify and extract important information elements; enhance text with semantically descriptive tags; and output the information that is needed in the format and structure that is needed. Mark A. Whiting, Wendy Cowley, Nick Cramer, Alex Gibson, Ryan Hohimer, Ryan Scott, Stephen Tratz |
ACM Symposium on Document Engineering | 7 |