Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Loren Staley

dblp:37/814 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 77% Cloud and datacenter computing · 23%
Computer networks
1 paper
Content delivery and video streaming · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.012002
Measuring the capacity of a streaming media server in a Utility Data Center environment · ACM Multimedia 2002
Content delivery and video streaming
streaming media service
0.012002
Measuring the capacity of a streaming media server in a Utility Data Center environment · ACM Multimedia 2002
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management
datacenter resource management
0.012002
Measuring the capacity of a streaming media server in a Utility Data Center environment · ACM Multimedia 2002
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Building a Performance Model of Streaming Media Applications in Utility Data Center Environment
abstract
Utility Data Center (UDC) provides a flexible, cost-effective infrastructure to support the hosting of applications for Internet services. In order to enable the design of a "utility-aware" streaming media service which automatically requests the necessary resources from UDC infrastructure, we introduce a set of benchmarks for measuring the basic capacities of streaming media systems. The benchmarks allow one to derive the scaling rules of server capacity for delivering media files which are: i) encoded at different bit rates, ii) streamed from memory vs disk. Using an experimental testbed, we show that these scaling rules are non-trivial. In this paper, we develop a workload-aware, media server performance model which is based on a cost function derived from the set of basic benchmark measurements. We validate this performance model by comparing the predicted and measured media server capacities for a set of synthetic workloads.
Ludmila Cherkasova, Loren Staley
CCGRID2
2002 Measuring the capacity of a streaming media server in a Utility Data Center environment
abstract
Abstract In order to design a "utility-aware" streaming media service which automatically requests the necessary resources from Utility Data Center infrastructure, several classic performance questions should be answered: how to measure the basic capacity of a streaming media server? what is the set of basic benchmarks exposing the performance limits and main bottlenecks of a media server? In this paper, we propose a set of benchmarks for measuring the basic capacities of streaming media systems for different expected workloads, and demonstrate the results using an experimental testbed.
Ludmila Cherkasova, Loren Staley
ACM Multimedia2