Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haeri Hwang

dblp:371/1432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0001-7462-1323ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 77% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
multi-robot systems
0.812024
Collabot: A Robotic System That Assists Library Users Through Collaboration Between Robots · HRI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user evaluation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Collabot: A Robotic System That Assists Library Users Through Collaboration Between Robots
abstract
A library serves as a repository of knowledge accessible to individuals of all ages, genders, educational backgrounds, social statuses, and economic levels. It stands as a communal space where community members can gather, bridging information disparities among various societal strata. To enhance accessibility to such libraries for a broader spectrum of people, we have introduced the CollaBot system. This system offers tailored services to users through the collaboration of robots. Our investigation encompassed the acceptance of robot types by users, robot characterization, and the prioritization of robot-provided services. Over the course of three stages of user evaluation, it became evident that participants preferred product-type robots over anthropomorphic robots. Furthermore, they expressed a preference for robots that assist other robots, even if these assisting robots exhibit clumsiness, as opposed to robots that exclusively excel in their designated tasks. Lastly, service prioritization varied based on the specific limitations or deficiencies faced by individual users.
Dahyun Kang, Haeri Hwang, Sonya S. Kwak
HRI2