Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haeri Hwang
dblp:371/1432
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0001-7462-1323ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 77% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 23% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction
multi-robot systems |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Collabot: A Robotic System That Assists Library Users Through Collaboration Between Robots · HRI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user evaluation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Collabot: A Robotic System That Assists Library Users Through Collaboration Between RobotsabstractA library serves as a repository of knowledge accessible to individuals of all ages, genders, educational backgrounds, social statuses, and economic levels. It stands as a communal space where community members can gather, bridging information disparities among various societal strata. To enhance accessibility to such libraries for a broader spectrum of people, we have introduced the CollaBot system. This system offers tailored services to users through the collaboration of robots. Our investigation encompassed the acceptance of robot types by users, robot characterization, and the prioritization of robot-provided services. Over the course of three stages of user evaluation, it became evident that participants preferred product-type robots over anthropomorphic robots. Furthermore, they expressed a preference for robots that assist other robots, even if these assisting robots exhibit clumsiness, as opposed to robots that exclusively excel in their designated tasks. Lastly, service prioritization varied based on the specific limitations or deficiencies faced by individual users. Dahyun Kang, Haeri Hwang, Sonya S. Kwak |
HRI | 2 |